Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686996›Full record

ArticleBiological trace element research2022

Total Blood Mercury Predicts Methylmercury Exposure in Fish and Shellfish Consumers.

Ellen M Wells, Leonid Kopylev, Rebecca Nachman, Elizabeth G Radke, Johanna Congleton, Deborah Segal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological trace element research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Which prenatal biomarker is most appropriate for methylmercury dose-response for neurodevelopmental effects?Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ellen M WellsSchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Leonid KopylevCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC, NW, 20460, USA.
Rebecca NachmanCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC, NW, 20460, USA.
Elizabeth G RadkeCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC, NW, 20460, USA.
Johanna CongletonCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC, NW, 20460, USA.
Deborah SegalCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC, NW, 20460, USA. Segal.Deborah@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-8766
Environmental Protection Agency · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Occupational Safety and Health Training GrantT03OH008615 · OH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI WELLS, ELLEN M · 2011 to 2025
$1.7M
NIOSH CDC HHS T03 OH008615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies evaluating methylmercury (MeHg) toxicity rely on whole blood total mercury (THg) measurements to estimate MeHg exposure. However, whole blood THg includes other forms of mercury (Hg), such as inorganic Hg, which have different exposure sources and toxicological effects than MeHg. Therefore, estimating the whole blood MeHg/THg ratio is critical to predicting MeHg exposure and, subsequently, efforts to establish an exposure-response relationship for use in risk assessment. A large, representative dataset (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2016) was used to determine the whole blood MeHg/THg ratio among (a) self-reported fish and shellfish consumers, ≥ 15 years of age (the "full adult" population (N = 5268 training dataset; N = 2336 test dataset)) and (b) female fish and shellfish consumers, 15-44 years of age (the "women of reproductive age" population (N = 1285 training dataset; N = 560 test dataset)). Unadjusted and adjusted linear and spline models with direct measurements for both THg and MeHg were evaluated. The mean whole blood MeHg/THg ratio was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74, 0.75). This ratio was significantly higher among those with higher THg concentrations. All models exhibited excellent fit (adjusted R

Indexed as

MercuryMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleFishesHumansNutrition SurveysSeafoodShellfishMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiomarkersMercuryMethylmercuryNHANESReproductive ageSeafood

Identifiers

PMID34686996
PMCPMC9200869
OpenAlexW3205745049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.