Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686909›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

The effect of cathodal transspinal direct current stimulation on tibialis anterior stretch reflex components in humans.

Eva Rudjord Therkildsen, Jens Bo Nielsen, Mikkel Malling Beck, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Jakob Lorentzen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva Rudjord TherkildsenDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute 33.3, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark. ertherkildsen@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4797-1050
Jens Bo NielsenDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute 33.3, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-2916
Mikkel Malling BeckDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Allé 51, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8006-2580
Tomofumi YamaguchiDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute 33.3, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2206-8586
Jakob LorentzenDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute 33.3, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-0218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal DC stimulation (tsDCS) shows promise as a technique for the facilitation of functional recovery of motor function following central nervous system (CNS) lesion. However, the network mechanisms that are responsible for the effects of tsDCS are still uncertain. Here, in a series of experiments, we tested the hypothesis that tsDCS increases the excitability of the long-latency stretch reflex, leading to increased excitability of corticospinal neurons in the primary motor cortex. Experiments were performed in 33 adult human subjects (mean age 28 ± 7 years/14 females). Subjects were seated in a reclining armchair with the right leg attached to a footplate, which could be quickly plantarflexed (100 deg/s; 6 deg amplitude) to induce stretch reflexes in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle at short (45 ms) and longer latencies (90-95 ms). This setup also enabled measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary evoked potentials (cMEPs) from TA evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation at the cervical junction, respectively. Cathodal tsDCS at 2.5 and 4 mA was found to increase the long-latency reflex without any significant effect on the short-latency reflex. Furthermore, TA MEPs, but not cMEPs, were increased following tsDCS. We conclude that cathodal tsDCS over lumbar segments may facilitate proprioceptive transcortical reflexes in the TA muscle, and we suggest that the most likely explanation of this facilitation is an effect on ascending fibers in the dorsal columns.

Indexed as

Motor CortexReflex, StretchAdultElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultMotor controlPlasticityTranscortical reflexTranscutaneous spinal direct current stimulationtsDCS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.