ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022
Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin for diagnosing evolution after cardiac surgery in newborns: the PRONEW study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adrenomedullin is a good marker of severity and prognosis in patients with bronchiolitis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- The Role of Adrenomedullin as a Predictive Marker of the Risk of Death and Adverse Clinical Events: A Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Newborns are the most vulnerable patients after cardiac surgery. Although mortality risk scores before surgery may help predict the risk of poor outcome, new tools are required, and biomarkers could add objective data to these tools. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (pro-ADM) and pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (pro-ANP) to predict poor outcome after cardiac surgery. This is a pilot diagnostic accuracy study that includes newborns and infants under 2 months admitted to an intensive care unit after cardiac surgery. Pro-ADM and pro-ANP were determined immediately upon admission. Poor outcome was defined as mortality, cardiac arrest, requiring extracorporeal support, requiring renal replacement therapy, or neurological injury. Forty-four patients were included. Twenty-six (59%) had a STAT category of ≥ 4. Ten patients (22.7%) presented a poor outcome, four of whom (9.1%) died. Pro-ADM was higher in patients with poor outcome (p = 0.024) and death (p = 0.012). Pro-ADM showed the best area under curve (AUC) for predicting poor outcome (0.735) and mortality alone (0.869). A pro-ADM of 2 nmol/L had a Sn of 75% and a Sp of 85% for predicting mortality. Pro-ADM > 2 nmol/L was independently associated with poor outcome (OR 5.8) and mortality (OR 14.1). Although higher pro-ANP values were associated with poor outcomes, no cut-off point were found. The combination of STAT ≥ 4 and the biomarkers did not enhance predictive power for poor outcome or mortality.Conclusion: Pro-ADM and pro-ANP determined immediately after surgery could be helpful for stratifying risk of poor outcome and mortality in newborns. What is Known: • Some congenital heart diseases must be corrected/palliated during the first days of life. A useful tool to predict the risk of severe complications has not been proposed. • Most unstable newborns would have higher values of biomarkers such as pro-ADM and pro-ANP related to shock and compensatory actions. What is New: • Pro-ADM and pro-ANP seem to be good biomarkers to predict poor outcome after cardiac surgery. A pro-ADM < 2 nmol/L would imply a low likelihood of a poor outcome. • Deepening the analysis of biomarkers can help in making decisions to prevent/treat complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.