Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686905›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2022

Systematic genetic testing for recessively inherited monogenic diabetes: a cross-sectional study in paediatric diabetes clinics.

Kashyap A Patel, Mehmet N Ozbek, Melek Yildiz, Tulay Guran, Cemil Kocyigit, Sezer Acar, Zeynep Siklar, Muge Atar, Kevin Colclough, Jayne Houghton and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Monogenic diabetes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Kashyap A PatelInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. k.a.patel@exeter.ac.uk.
Mehmet N OzbekDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Gazi Yasargil Diyarbakir Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Melek YildizDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tulay GuranDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cemil KocyigitDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Sezer AcarDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Zeynep SiklarDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Muge AtarDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Kocaeil University Hospital, Izmit, Turkey.
Kevin ColcloughDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter National Health Service Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Jayne HoughtonDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter National Health Service Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Matthew B JohnsonInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Sian EllardInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Sarah E FlanaganInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Filiz CizmeciogluDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Kocaeil University Hospital, Izmit, Turkey.
Merih BerberogluDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Korcan DemirDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Gonul CatliDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Serpil BasDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Teoman AkcayDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Huseyin DemirbilekDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Michael N WeedonInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Andrew T HattersleyInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GBNational Health Service · GBAnkara University · TRDokuz Eylül University · TRMarmara University · TRDiyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRHacettepe University · TRIstanbul University · TRIstinye University · TRSüleyman Demirel University · TR

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105636/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 110082/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust WT098395/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisCurrent clinical guidelines for childhood-onset monogenic diabetes outside infancy are mainly focused on identifying and testing for dominantly inherited, predominantly MODY genes. There are no systematic studies of the recessively inherited causes of monogenic diabetes that are likely to be more common in populations with high rates of consanguinity. We aimed to determine the contribution of recessive causes of monogenic diabetes in paediatric diabetes clinics and to identify clinical criteria by which to select individuals for recessive monogenic diabetes testing.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 1093 children from seven paediatric diabetes clinics across Turkey (a population with high rates of consanguinity). We undertook genetic testing of 50 known dominant and recessive causes of monogenic diabetes for 236 children at low risk of type 1 diabetes. As a comparison, we used monogenic diabetes cases from UK paediatric diabetes clinics (a population with low rates of consanguinity).

resultsThirty-four children in the Turkish cohort had monogenic diabetes, equating to a minimal prevalence of 3.1%, similar to that in the UK cohort (p = 0.40). Forty-one per cent (14/34) had autosomal recessive causes in contrast to 1.6% (2/122) in the UK monogenic diabetes cohort (p < 0.0001). All conventional criteria for identifying monogenic diabetes (parental diabetes, not requiring insulin treatment, HbA CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationRecessively inherited mutations are a common cause of monogenic diabetes in populations with high rates of consanguinity. Present MODY-focused genetic testing strategies do not identify affected individuals. To detect all cases of monogenic paediatric diabetes, it is crucial that recessive genes are included in genetic panels and that children are selected for testing if they have certain non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic features in addition to current criteria.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantMaleRisk AssessmentTurkeyDiabetes syndromeMODYMonogenic diabetesRecessive monogenic diabetesSyndromic diabetesType 1 diabetesType 1 diabetes genetic risk score

Identifiers

PMID34686905
PMCPMC8741690
OpenAlexW3206828328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.