Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686701›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Whole genome sequencing and protein structure analyses of target genes for the detection of Salmonella.

Lijun Hu, Guojie Cao, Eric W Brown, Marc W Allard, Li M Ma, Guodong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole-genome sequencing analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genomic diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lijun HuDivision of Microbiology, Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
Guojie CaoDivision of Microbiology, Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
Eric W BrownDivision of Microbiology, Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
Marc W AllardDivision of Microbiology, Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
Li M MaInstitute for Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74074, USA.
Guodong ZhangDivision of Microbiology, Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD, 20740, USA. Guodong.Zhang@FDA.HHS.GOV.ORCID 0000-0001-8808-7435
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USOklahoma State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and sensitive detection of Salmonella is a critical step in routine food quality control, outbreak investigation, and food recalls. Although various genes have been the targets in the design of rapid molecular detection methods for Salmonella, there is limited information on the diversity of these target genes at the level of DNA sequence and the encoded protein structures. In this study, we investigated the diversity of ten target genes (invA, fimA, phoP, spvC, and agfA; ttrRSBCA operon including 5 genes) commonly used in the detection and identification of Salmonella. To this end, we performed whole genome sequencing of 143 isolates of Salmonella serotypes (Enteritidis, Typhimurium, and Heidelberg) obtained from poultry (eggs and chicken). Phylogenetic analysis showed that Salmonella ser. Typhimurium was more diverse than either Enteritidis or Heidelberg. Forty-five non-synonymous mutations were identified in the target genes from the 143 isolates, with the two most common mutations as T ↔ C (15 times) and A ↔ G (13 times). The gene spvC was primarily present in Salmonella ser. Enteritidis isolates and absent from Heidelberg isolates, whereas ttrR was more conserved (0 non-synonymous mutations) than ttrS, ttrB, ttrC, and ttrA (7, 2, 2, and 7 non-synonymous mutations, respectively). Notably, we found one non-synonymous mutation (fimA-Mut.6) across all Salmonella ser. Enteritidis and Salmonella ser. Heidelberg, C → T (496 nt postion), resulting in the change at AA 166 position, Glutamine (Q) → Stop condon (TAG), suggesting that the fimA gene has questionable sites as a target for detection. Using Phyre

Indexed as

AnimalsCodon, TerminatorMutationOperonPhylogenyPoultryProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandProteinsSalmonella enteritidisSerogroupWhole Genome SequencingCodon, TerminatorProteins

Identifiers

PMID34686701
PMCPMC8536731
OpenAlexW3207113860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.