Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686679›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Optimal time lags from causal prediction model help stratify and forecast nervous system pathology.

Theodoros Bermperidis, Richa Rai, Jihye Ryu, Damiano Zanotto, Sunil K Agrawal, Anil K Lalwani, Elizabeth B Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Theodoros BermperidisPsychology Department, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA. tb642@psych.rutgers.edu.
Richa RaiPsychology Department, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA.
Jihye RyuNeurosurgery Department, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Damiano ZanottoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, USA.
Sunil K AgrawalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Anil K LalwaniNew York Presbyterian-Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA.
Elizabeth B TorresPsychology Department, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA. ebtorres@psych.rutgers.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional clinical approaches diagnose disorders of the nervous system using standardized observational criteria. Although aiming for homogeneity of symptoms, this method often results in highly heterogeneous disorders. A standing question thus is how to automatically stratify a given random cohort of the population, such that treatment can be better tailored to each cluster's symptoms, and severity of any given group forecasted to provide neuroprotective therapies. In this work we introduce new methods to automatically stratify a random cohort of the population composed of healthy controls of different ages and patients with different disorders of the nervous systems. Using a simple walking task and measuring micro-fluctuations in their biorhythmic motions, we combine non-linear causal network connectivity analyses in the temporal and frequency domains with stochastic mapping. The methods define a new type of internal motor timings. These are amenable to create personalized clinical interventions tailored to self-emerging clusters signaling fundamentally different types of gait pathologies. We frame our results using the principle of reafference and operationalize them using causal prediction, thus renovating the theory of internal models for the study of neuromotor control.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGaitHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalNervous SystemWalkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34686679
PMCPMC8536772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.