Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686555›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Total hip arthroplasty versus progressive resistance training in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis: protocol for a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled superiority trial.

Thomas Frydendal, Robin Christensen, Inger Mechlenburg, Lone Ramer Mikkelsen, Søren Overgaard, Kim Gordon Ingwersen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04070027 (Progressive Resistance Training Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With End-stage Hip Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04070027 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Progressive Resistance Training Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With End-stage Hip Osteoarthritis (PROHIP): A Multicentre, Parallel-group, Randomised Controlled Superiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVejle HospitalRan2019 to 2026Enrolled109ConditionsHip OsteoarthritisArmsTotal Hip Arthroplasty, Progressive Resistance Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas FrydendalDepartment of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark thomas.frydendal@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-4060-3792
Robin ChristensenSection for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Inger MechlenburgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lone Ramer MikkelsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren OvergaardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kim Gordon IngwersenDepartment of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-4532
Aarhus University · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHip osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although, being considered as the surgery of the century up to 23% of the patients report long-term pain, and deficits in physical function and muscle strength may persist after THA. Progressive resistance training (PRT) appears to improve multiple outcomes moderately in patients with hip OA. Current treatment selection is based on low-level evidence as no randomised controlled trials have compared THA to non-surgical treatment. The primary aim of this trial is to investigate whether THA followed by standard care is superior to 12 weeks of supervised PRT followed by 12 weeks of optional unsupervised PRT for improving hip pain and function in patients with severe hip OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial conducted at four hospitals across three healthcare regions in Denmark. 120 patients aged ≥50 years with clinical and radiographic hip OA found eligible for THA by an orthopaedic surgeon will be randomised to THA followed by standard care, or 12 weeks of PRT (allocation 1:1). The primary outcome will be change in patient-reported hip pain and function, measured using the Oxford Hip Score, from baseline to 6 months after initiating the treatment. Key secondary outcomes will be change in the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, University of California Los Angeles Activity Score, 40 m fast-paced walk test, 30 s chair stand test and occurrence of serious adverse events. Patients declining participation in the trial will be invited into a prospective observational cohort study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (Project-ID: S-20180158). All results will be presented in peer-reviewed scientific journals and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04070027).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipOsteoarthritis, HipResistance TrainingEquivalence Trials as TopicHipHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeclinical trialshipmusculoskeletal disordersorthopaedic & trauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID34686555
PMCPMC8543646
OpenAlexW3204997903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.