Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686551›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Cost-effectiveness of household contact investigation for detection of tuberculosis in Pakistan.

Hamidah Hussain, Amyn Malik, Junaid F Ahmed, Sara Siddiqui, Farhana Amanullah, Jacob Creswell, Thorkild Tylleskär, Bjarne Robberstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cash transfers to enhance completion of TB screening among household contacts in rural Tanzania.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2024
    Article
  6. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant TB among household contacts in a high burden setting.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  7. A model for integrating social protection measures with TB control in Pakistan.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hamidah HussainCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway hamidah.hussain@ird.global.ORCID 0000-0002-6585-9815
Amyn MalikInteractive Research and Development (IRD) Global, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4875-9916
Junaid F AhmedGlobal Health Directorate, Indus Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sara SiddiquiGlobal Health Directorate, Indus Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Farhana AmanullahThe Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Jacob CreswellStop TB Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
Thorkild TylleskärCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bjarne RobberstadCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite WHO guidelines recommending household contact investigation, and studies showing the impact of active screening, most tuberculosis (TB) programmes in resource-limited settings only carry out passive contact investigation. The cost of such strategies is often cited as barriers to their implementation. However, little data are available for the additional costs required to implement this strategy. We aimed to estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of active contact investigation as compared with passive contact investigation in urban Pakistan.

methodsWe estimated the cost-effectiveness of 'enhanced' (passive with follow-up) and 'active' (household visit) contact investigations compared with standard 'passive' contact investigation from providers and the programme's perspective using a simple decision tree. Costs were collected in Pakistan from a TB clinic performing passive contact investigation and from studies of active contact tracing interventions conducted. The effectiveness was based on the number of patients with TB identified among household contacts screened.

resultsThe addition of enhanced contact investigation to the existing passive mode detected 3.8 times more cases of TB per index patient compared with passive contact investigation alone. The incremental cost was US$30 per index patient, which yielded an incremental cost of US$120 per incremental patient identified with TB. The active contact investigation was 1.5 times more effective than enhanced contact investigation with an incremental cost of US$238 per incremental patient with TB identified.

conclusionOur results show that enhanced and active approaches to contact investigation effectively identify additional patients with TB among household contacts at a relatively modest cost. These strategies can be added to the passive contact investigation in a high burden setting to find the people with TB who are missed and meet the End TB strategy goals.

Indexed as

Contact TracingTuberculosisCost-Benefit AnalysisFamily CharacteristicsHumansPakistanhealth economicshealth policytuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34686551
PMCPMC8543626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.