ArticleBMJ open quality2021
Summarised, verified and accessible: improving clinical information management for potential haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing heart valve disease surveillance: a quality improvement project demonstrating cost-effective triaging and Clinical Scientist-led services to improve patient care.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- Quality improvement project to reduce beta-D-glucan turnaround times in an NHS pathology network.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Reducing laboratory delays in blood culture pathogen identification: a quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Time is a terrible thing to waste: optimising use of intraoperative monitoring practitioner time towards maximising in-house IOM service provision and reducing spend on external provision.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Reducing first appointment delays for electron radiotherapy patients by improving the treatment planning pathway: a quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Clinical-scientist-led transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE): using extended roles to improve the service.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Time to be more efficient: reducing wasted transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) diagnostic appointment slots at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Doing today's work today: real-time data recording and rolling audit in an IVF clinic.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Getting going on time: reducing neurophysiology set-up times in order to contribute to improving surgery start and finish times.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Improving the turnaround times of infectious disease markers reporting in an NHS stem cell department.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Welsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory (WTAIL) is responsible for managing patient work-up for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only potentially curative option for many haematological and non-haematological conditions. Work-up requires regular communication between WTAIL and the transplanting clinicians, facilitated by weekly multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, to agree decisions and proceed through each work-up stage. Effective communication and minimising error are critical, as transplanting cells from a suboptimal donor could have severe or fatal consequences for the patient. We reviewed our HSCT patient management and identified issues including staff dissatisfaction with the inefficiency of the current (paper-based) system and concern about the potential for incidents caused by errors in manual transcription of patient information and tracking clinical decisions. Another driver for change was the COVID-19 pandemic, which prevented the usual face-to-face MDT meetings in which staff would show clinicians the paper records and reports; the shift to online MDT required new ways of sharing data. In this project we developed a new central reference point for our patient management data along with electronic patient summary sheets, designed with an eye to improving safety and efficiency. Over several improvement cycles we tested and refined the summary sheets with staff and clinicians and experimented with videoconferencing to facilitate data sharing. We conducted interviews with staff from which we concluded that the new process successfully reduced transcription and duplication and improved communication with the clinicians during the pandemic. Despite an increase in workload due to build-up of active patient work-up cases during the pandemic, staff reported that the new summaries enabled them to cope well. A key initiative was creation of a 'Task and Finish' group that helped establish continual improvement culture and identified additional areas for improvement which have been followed up in further improvement projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.