Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686487›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2021

Summarised, verified and accessible: improving clinical information management for potential haematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.

Felicity May, Jennifer Pepperall, Elaine Davies, Sarah Dyer, Nathan Proudlove, Margaret Tracey Rees

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felicity MayWelsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Welsh Blood Service, Pontyclun, UK Felicity.May@wales.nhs.uk.
Jennifer PepperallWelsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Welsh Blood Service, Pontyclun, UK.
Elaine DaviesWelsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Welsh Blood Service, Pontyclun, UK.
Sarah DyerWelsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Welsh Blood Service, Pontyclun, UK.
Nathan ProudloveAlliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-8088
Margaret Tracey ReesWelsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Welsh Blood Service, Pontyclun, UK.
Welsh Government · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Welsh Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory (WTAIL) is responsible for managing patient work-up for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only potentially curative option for many haematological and non-haematological conditions. Work-up requires regular communication between WTAIL and the transplanting clinicians, facilitated by weekly multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, to agree decisions and proceed through each work-up stage. Effective communication and minimising error are critical, as transplanting cells from a suboptimal donor could have severe or fatal consequences for the patient. We reviewed our HSCT patient management and identified issues including staff dissatisfaction with the inefficiency of the current (paper-based) system and concern about the potential for incidents caused by errors in manual transcription of patient information and tracking clinical decisions. Another driver for change was the COVID-19 pandemic, which prevented the usual face-to-face MDT meetings in which staff would show clinicians the paper records and reports; the shift to online MDT required new ways of sharing data. In this project we developed a new central reference point for our patient management data along with electronic patient summary sheets, designed with an eye to improving safety and efficiency. Over several improvement cycles we tested and refined the summary sheets with staff and clinicians and experimented with videoconferencing to facilitate data sharing. We conducted interviews with staff from which we concluded that the new process successfully reduced transcription and duplication and improved communication with the clinicians during the pandemic. Despite an increase in workload due to build-up of active patient work-up cases during the pandemic, staff reported that the new summaries enabled them to cope well. A key initiative was creation of a 'Task and Finish' group that helped establish continual improvement culture and identified additional areas for improvement which have been followed up in further improvement projects.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInformation ManagementPandemicsSARS-CoV-2efficiencylaboratory medicineorganisationalPDSAquality improvementtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID34686487
PMCPMC8543752
OpenAlexW3206945116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.