Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686474›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2021

Development and validation of a weakly supervised deep learning framework to predict the status of molecular pathways and key mutations in colorectal cancer from routine histology images: a retrospective study.

Mohsin Bilal, Shan E Ahmed Raza, Ayesha Azam, Simon Graham, Mohammad Ilyas, Ian A Cree, David Snead, Fayyaz Minhas, Nasir M Rajpoot

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Deep Learning on H&E Pathology Images PredictsDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. KRASCellular & molecular biology letters · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohsin BilalTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Shan E Ahmed RazaTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Ayesha AzamTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Simon GrahamTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Mohammad IlyasFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ian A CreeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
David SneadDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Fayyaz MinhasTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nasir M RajpootTissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK. Electronic address: n.m.rajpoot@warwick.ac.uk.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P015476/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining the status of molecular pathways and key mutations in colorectal cancer is crucial for optimal therapeutic decision making. We therefore aimed to develop a novel deep learning pipeline to predict the status of key molecular pathways and mutations from whole-slide images of haematoxylin and eosin-stained colorectal cancer slides as an alternative to current tests.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we used 502 diagnostic slides of primary colorectal tumours from 499 patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas colon and rectal cancer (TCGA-CRC-DX) cohort and developed a weakly supervised deep learning framework involving three separate convolutional neural network models. Whole-slide images were divided into equally sized tiles and model 1 (ResNet18) extracted tumour tiles from non-tumour tiles. These tumour tiles were inputted into model 2 (adapted ResNet34), trained by iterative draw and rank sampling to calculate a prediction score for each tile that represented the likelihood of a tile belonging to the molecular labels of high mutation density (vs low mutation density), microsatellite instability (vs microsatellite stability), chromosomal instability (vs genomic stability), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-high (vs CIMP-low), BRAF

findingsOur iterative draw and rank sampling method yielded mean AUROCs for the prediction of hypermutation (0·81 [SD 0·03] vs 0·71), microsatellite instability (0·86 [0·04] vs 0·74), chromosomal instability (0·83 [0·02] vs 0·73), BRAF

interpretationAfter large-scale validation, our proposed algorithm for predicting clinically important mutations and molecular pathways, such as microsatellite instability, in colorectal cancer could be used to stratify patients for targeted therapies with potentially lower costs and quicker turnaround times than sequencing-based or immunohistochemistry-based approaches.

fundingThe UK Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningMicrosatellite InstabilityMutationPhenotypeArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorColonHistological TechniquesHumansRectumRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34686474
PMCPMC8609154
OpenAlexW3205605830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.