ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2021
Intracortical diffusion tensor imaging signature of microstructural changes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- ENT1 inhibition links oligodendrocyte lipid metabolism to connectivity in tauopathy.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cortical Microstructure Differs in Nonmanifest and Manifest Genetic Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Advanced neuroimaging assessment of neurodegenerative dementia syndromes: A framework for comprehensive multimodal FDG-PET, MR-perfusion, and MR-diffusion analysis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Clinical and Imaging Features of Sporadic and Genetic Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration TDP-43 A and B.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Predicting progression from MCI to dementia using cortical disarray measurement from diffusion MRI.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of diffusion MRI-derived measures of cortical microstructure in a real-world memory clinic setting.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024Article
- In vivo cortical diffusion imaging relates to Alzheimer's disease neuropathology.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Association of cortical and subcortical microstructure with disease severity: impact on cognitive decline and language impairments in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Multiclass characterization of frontotemporal dementia variants via multimodal brain network computational inference.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Inter- and intra-individual variation in brain structural-cognition relationships in aging.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Tauopathy Animal Models.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a neuropathological construct with multiple clinical presentations, including the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia-both non-fluent variant (nfvPPA) and semantic variant (svPPA)-progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS), characterised by the deposition of abnormal tau protein in the brain. A major challenge for treating FTLD is early diagnosis and accurate discrimination among different syndromes. The main goal here was to investigate the cortical architecture of FTLD syndromes using cortical diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis and to test its power to discriminate between different clinical presentations.
methodsA total of 271 individuals were included in the study: 87 healthy subjects (HS), 31 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), 37 behavioural variant (bvFTD), 30 non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), 47 PSP Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS) and 39 CBS cases. 3T MRI T1-weighted images and DTI scans were analysed to extract three cortical DTI derived measures (AngleR, PerpPD and ParlPD) and mean diffusivity (MD), as well as standard volumetric measurements. Whole brain and regional data were extracted. Linear discriminant analysis was used to assess the group discrimination capability of volumetric and DTI measures to differentiate the FTLD syndromes. In addition, in order to further investigate differential diagnosis in CBS and PSP-RS, a subgroup of subjects with autopsy confirmation in the training cohort was used to select features which were then tested in the test cohort. Three different challenges were explored: a binary classification (controls vs all patients), a multiclass classification (HS vs bvFTD vs svPPA vs nfvPPA vs CBS vs PSP-RS) and an additional binary classification to differentiate CBS and PSP-RS using features selected in an autopsy confirmed subcohort.
resultsLinear discriminant analysis revealed that PerpPD was the best feature to distinguish between controls and all patients (ACC 86%). PerpPD regional values were able to classify correctly the different FTLD syndromes with an accuracy of 85.6%. The PerpPD and volumetric values selected to differentiate CBS and PSP-RS patients showed a classification accuracy of 85.2%.
conclusions(I) PerpPD achieved the highest classification power for differentiating healthy controls and FTLD syndromes and FTLD syndromes among themselves. (II) PerpPD regional values could provide an additional marker to differentiate FTD, PSP-RS and CBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.