Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686130›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

Impact of the gut microecology on Campylobacter presence revealed by comparisons of the gut microbiota from chickens raised on litter or in individual cages.

Wei Yan, Qianqian Zhou, Zhongyang Yuan, Liang Fu, Chaoliang Wen, Ning Yang, Congjiao Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Consequences ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei YanPoultry Science Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qianqian ZhouPoultry Science Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhongyang YuanPoultry Science Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Liang FuPoultry Science Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chaoliang WenPoultry Science Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ning YangPoultry Science Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Congjiao SunPoultry Science Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. cjsun@cau.edu.cn.
Ministry of Agriculture · IDChina Agricultural University · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoultry is the major reservoir of Campylobacter that contributes to human campylobacteriosis and threatens food safety. Litter contact has been linked to Campylobacter colonization, but the gut microecological impact underlying this link remains not fully clear. Here, we sought to investigate the impact of the gut microecology on the presence of Campylobacter by examining the microbiota in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, ceca, and feces from chickens raised on commercial litter and in individual cages at 0-57 days of age.

resultsThrough litter contact, the presence of Campylobacter was found to benefit from microecological competition among Lactobacillus, Helicobacter, and genera that are halotolerant and aerobic or facultatively anaerobic in the upper intestine, such as Corynebacterium and Brachybacterium. The presence was also promoted by the increased abundance in obligate anaerobic fermentation microbes, especially members of the orders Clostridiales and Bacteroidales. The longitudinal analysis supported the vertical or pseudo-vertical transmission but suggested that colonization might occur immensely at 7-28 days of age. We observed a host genetic effect on the gut microecology, which might lead to increased heterogeneity of the microecological impact on Campylobacter colonization.

conclusionsThe findings advance the understanding of the gut microecological impact on Campylobacter presence in the chicken gut under conditions of litter contact and suggest that manipulations of the gut microecology, as well as the microbes identified in the Campylobacter association networks, might be important for the development of intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacteriaCampylobacterChickensGastrointestinal TractMicrobial InteractionsCampylobacterChickenGut microbiomeGut microecology

Identifiers

PMID34686130
PMCPMC8532315
OpenAlexW3207428658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.