Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34685976›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Dynamics of Macronutrient Uptake and Removal by Modern Peanut Cultivars.

Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol, José Roberto Portugal, João William Bossolani, Luiz Gustavo Moretti, Adalton Mazetti Fernandes, Jader Luis Nantes Garcia, Gleize Leviski de Brito Garcia, Cristiane Pilon, Heitor Cantarella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlos Alexandre Costa CrusciolDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-1071
José Roberto PortugalDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7767-4455
João William BossolaniDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-8338
Luiz Gustavo MorettiDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7693-7826
Adalton Mazetti FernandesCenter of Tropical Roots and Starches (CERAT), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6745-0175
Jader Luis Nantes GarciaDepartment of Forest, Soil and Environmental Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil.
Gleize Leviski de Brito GarciaDepartment of Forest, Soil and Environmental Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil.
Cristiane PilonCollege of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Georgia, 2356 Rainwater Road Tifton, Athens, GA 31793, USA.
Heitor CantarellaSoils and Environmental Resources Center, Agronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC), Av. Barão de Itapura 1481, Campinas 13020-902, SP, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303119/2016-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The productive potential of new peanut cultivars has increased over the years in relation to old cultivars, especially when compared with ones with upright growth habit. Thus, the requirement for macronutrients for these new cultivars may also have increased, making the existing fertilizer recommendation tables obsolete, thus increasing the need for further studies measuring the real macronutrient requirements of these new peanut cultivars. Our study aimed to evaluate the growth patterns and the macronutrient absorption rate throughout the biological cycle of three modern runner peanut cultivars, as well as the potential for producing dry matter, pods, and kernels, and their respective macronutrient accumulations. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with split-plots and nine replications. The experimental plots consisted of three peanut cultivars (IAC Runner 886, IAC 505, and IAC OL3), and subplots consisted of nine plant samplings (14, 28, 42, 56, 70, 84, 105, 126, and 147 days after emergence (DAE)). Our results showed that modern peanut cultivars presented nutrient accumulation around 30 to 40 days earlier than older cultivars, as well as increasing the uptake by K and Ca. IAC 505 absorbed higher amounts of macronutrients and resulted in greater dry matter production compared with IAC OL3 and IAC Runner 886. Our study demonstrated that the most appropriate time for plants to find greater availability of nutrients in the soil is 70 to 84 DAE, in addition to highlighting the need for updates on nutritional recommendations for higher yields of modern peanut cultivars.

Indexed as

Arachis hypogaea L.mineral absorptionplant growthplant nutrition

Identifiers

PMID34685976
PMCPMC8539890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.