Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34685672›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Eric Röttinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diffuse pacemaker mechanism with distinctive organization drives pulsation in the octocoralProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genome of the sea anemoneFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Neural Cell Type Diversity in Cnidaria.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eric RöttingerInstitute for Research on Cancer and Aging in Nice (IRCAN), CNRS, INSERM, Université Côte d'Azur, 06107 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2938-6774

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-11-LABX-0028Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-CE13-0014Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Diversity of Biological Mechanisms
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity to regenerate lost or injured body parts is a widespread feature within metazoans and has intrigued scientists for centuries. One of the most extreme types of regeneration is the so-called whole body regenerative capacity, which enables regeneration of fully functional organisms from isolated body parts. While not exclusive to this habitat, whole body regeneration is widespread in aquatic/marine invertebrates. Over the past decade, new whole-body research models have emerged that complement the historical models

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsHemostasisPhylogenyRegenerationReproductionSea Anemonesanthozoacnidariafunctional genomicsmarine organismNematostella vectensisregenerationsea anemonestress responsewhole-body regeneration

Identifiers

PMID34685672
PMCPMC8534814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.