Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34685628›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Antibiotics Treatment Modulates Microglia-Synapses Interaction.

Federica Cordella, Caterina Sanchini, Maria Rosito, Laura Ferrucci, Natalia Pediconi, Barbara Cortese, Francesca Guerrieri, Giuseppe Rubens Pascucci, Fabrizio Antonangeli, Giovanna Peruzzi and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The microbiota-gut- hippocampus axis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Human Microbiome-A Physiologic Perspective.Comprehensive Physiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica CordellaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Caterina SanchiniDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Maria RositoCenter for Life Nano- & Neuro-Science, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Laura FerrucciDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Natalia PediconiCenter for Life Nano- & Neuro-Science, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Barbara CorteseNational Research Council-Nanotechnology Institute, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8667-7255
Francesca GuerrieriCancer Research Center of Lyon (CRCL), UMR Inserm U1052/CNRS 5286, 69373 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-4394
Giuseppe Rubens PascucciCancer Research Center of Lyon (CRCL), UMR Inserm U1052/CNRS 5286, 69373 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5978-1193
Fabrizio AntonangeliDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory Affiliated to Istituto Pasteur Italia, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6369-2249
Giovanna PeruzziCenter for Life Nano- & Neuro-Science, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Maria GiubettiniCrestOptics S.p.A., Via di Torre Rossa 66, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Bernadette BasilicoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Francesca PaganiCenter for Life Nano- & Neuro-Science, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Alfonso GrimaldiCenter for Life Nano- & Neuro-Science, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppina D'AlessandroDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Cristina LimatolaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Laboratory Affiliated to Istituto Pasteur Italia, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7504-8197
Davide RagozzinoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Silvia Di AngelantonioDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1434-3648
Italian Institute of Technology · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRIstituto Pasteur · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITEuropean Brain Research Institute · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

IIT-CrestOptics JointLab For Advenced MicroscopyRegione Lazio Life2020 MARBEL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Dysbiosis' of the adult gut microbiota, in response to challenges such as infection, altered diet, stress, and antibiotics treatment has been recently linked to pathological alteration of brain function and behavior. Moreover, gut microbiota composition constantly controls microglia maturation, as revealed by morphological observations and gene expression analysis. However, it is unclear whether microglia functional properties and crosstalk with neurons, known to shape and modulate synaptic development and function, are influenced by the gut microbiota. Here, we investigated how antibiotic-mediated alteration of the gut microbiota influences microglial and neuronal functions in adult mice hippocampus. Hippocampal microglia from adult mice treated with oral antibiotics exhibited increased microglia density, altered basal patrolling activity, and impaired process rearrangement in response to damage. Patch clamp recordings at CA3-CA1 synapses revealed that antibiotics treatment alters neuronal functions, reducing spontaneous postsynaptic glutamatergic currents and decreasing synaptic connectivity, without reducing dendritic spines density. Antibiotics treatment was unable to modulate synaptic function in CX3CR1-deficient mice, pointing to an involvement of microglia-neuron crosstalk through the CX3CL1/CX3CR1 axis in the effect of dysbiosis on neuronal functions. Together, our findings show that antibiotic alteration of gut microbiota impairs synaptic efficacy, suggesting that CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling supporting microglia is a major player in in the gut-brain axis, and in particular in the gut microbiota-to-neuron communication pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChemokine CX3CL1CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1Gene Expression RegulationGlutamic AcidHippocampusInflammationMiceMicrogliaNeuronsSignal TransductionSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionAnti-Bacterial AgentsChemokine CX3CL1CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1Glutamic AcidantibioticsCX3CL1/CX3CR1glutamatergic synapsesgut–brain axishippocampal sliceshippocampusmicrogliapatch clamp

Identifiers

PMID34685628
PMCPMC8534187
OpenAlexW3202197327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.