Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34685580›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Comparative Analysis of Six IRF Family Members in Alveolar Epithelial Cell-Intrinsic Antiviral Responses.

Sandra Wüst, Paulina Schad, Sandy Burkart, Marco Binder

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra WüstResearch Group "Dynamics of Viral Infection and the Innate Antiviral Response", Division F170, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Paulina SchadResearch Group "Dynamics of Viral Infection and the Innate Antiviral Response", Division F170, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sandy BurkartResearch Group "Dynamics of Viral Infection and the Innate Antiviral Response", Division F170, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1096-0550
Marco BinderResearch Group "Dynamics of Viral Infection and the Innate Antiviral Response", Division F170, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-6109
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 272983813 (TRR179 TP11)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BI1693/1-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host cell-intrinsic antiviral responses are largely mediated by pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) signaling and the interferon (IFN) system. The IFN regulatory factor (IRF) family of transcription factors takes up a central role in transcriptional regulation of antiviral innate immunity. IRF3 and IRF7 are known to be key players downstream of PRRs mediating the induction of type I and III IFNs. IFN signaling then requires IRF9 for the expression of the full array of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) ultimately defining the antiviral state of the cell. Other members of the IRF family clearly play a role in mediating or modulating IFN responses, such as IRF1, IRF2 or IRF5, however their relative contribution to mounting a functional antiviral response is much less understood. In this study, we systematically and comparatively assessed the impact of six members of the IRF family on antiviral signaling in alveolar epithelial cells. We generated functional knockouts of IRF1, -2, -3, -5, -7, and -9 in A549 cells, and measured their impact on the expression of IFNs and further cytokines, ISGs and other IRFs, as well as on viral replication. Our results confirmed the vital importance of IRF3 and IRF9 in establishing an antiviral state, whereas IRF1, 5 and 7 were largely dispensable. The previously described inhibitory activity of IRF2 could not be observed in our experimental system.

Indexed as

Alveolar Epithelial CellsHumansImmunity, InnateInterferon Regulatory Factor-1Interferon Regulatory Factor-7Interferon Regulatory FactorsInterferonsInterferon-Stimulated Gene Factor 3, gamma SubunitSignal TransductionVirus ReplicationInterferon Regulatory Factor-1Interferon Regulatory Factor-7Interferon Regulatory FactorsInterferonsInterferon-Stimulated Gene Factor 3, gamma SubunitIRF1 protein, humanIRF5 protein, humanIRF7 protein, humanIRF9 protein, humanantiviral responsecytokinesinnate immunityinterferonIRFspattern recognition receptorsPRR signalingRIG-I-like receptorsRLR signalingtranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID34685580
PMCPMC8533862
OpenAlexW3204106057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.