ArticleCells2021
Profiling of Serum Metabolites of Acute Intermittent Porphyria and Asymptomatic HMBS Mutation Carriers.
Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Therapy Follows Diagnosis: Old and New Approaches for the Treatment of Acute Porphyrias, What We Know and What We Should Know.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Acute intermittent porphyria: prevalence of pathogenicAnnals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Metabolic Changes in Acute Intermittent Porphyria Patients by Targeted Metabolomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Cutting-Edge Therapies and Novel Strategies for Acute Intermittent Porphyria: Step-by-Step towards the Solution.Biomedicines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to present the serum metabolite profiles of patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) and identify specific metabolites that could potentially discriminate between AIP, asymptomatic HMBS mutation carriers, and healthy individuals. The study cohort included 46 female participants: 21 AIP patients, 5 asymptomatic carriers, and 20 'normal' participants (without HMBS gene mutation). Serum samples were analyzed for 157 selected metabolites or clinical variables using an assay combining liquid chromatography MS/MS and direct flow injection. AUC analysis was used to distinguish unique variables between the three groups. A total of 15 variables differed significantly between the AIP and normal control group (VIP score > 1.0 and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.