Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34685331›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

In Vitro Models for the Development of Peripheral Nerve Conduits, Part I: Design of a Fibrin Gel-Based Non-Contact Test.

Paola De Stefano, Angelica Silvia Federici, Lorenza Draghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paola De StefanoDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G. Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Via Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-7638
Angelica Silvia FedericiDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G. Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Via Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milan, Italy.
Lorenza DraghiDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G. Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Via Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4744-7777
National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology · ITPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current clinical strategies to repair peripheral nerve injuries draw on different approaches depending on the extent of lost tissue. Nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) are considered to be a promising, off-the-shelf alternative to autografts when modest gaps need to be repaired. Unfortunately, to date, the implantation of an NGC prevents the sacrifice of a healthy nerve at the price of suboptimal clinical performance. Despite the significant number of materials and fabrication strategies proposed, an ideal combination has not been yet identified. Validation and comparison of NGCs ultimately requires in vivo animal testing due to the lack of alternative models, but in the spirit of the 3R principles, a reliable in vitro model for preliminary screening is highly desirable. Nevertheless, more traditional in vitro tests, and direct cell seeding on the material in particular, are not representative of the actual regeneration scenario. Thus, we have designed a very simple set-up in the attempt to appreciate the relevant features of NGCs through in vitro testing, and we have verified its applicability using electrospun NGCs. To this aim, neural cells were encapsulated in a loose fibrin gel and enclosed within the NGC membrane. Different thicknesses and porosity values of two popular polymers (namely gelatin and polycaprolactone) were compared. Results indicate that, with specific implementation, the system might represent a useful tool to characterize crucial NGC design aspects.

Indexed as

electrospinningfibrin gel encapsulationin vitro modelsnerve guidance conduitsperipheral nerve regenerationporosity

Identifiers

PMID34685331
PMCPMC8540146
OpenAlexW3207843697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.