Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34685262›Full record

ReviewPolymers2021

Progress in the Valorization of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes: Active Packaging, Biocomposites, By-Products, and Innovative Technologies Used for Bioactive Compound Extraction.

Mohd Salahuddin Mohd Basri, Nor Nadiah Abdul Karim Shah, Alifdalino Sulaiman, Intan Syafinaz Mohamed Amin Tawakkal, Mohd Zuhair Mohd Nor, Siti Hajar Ariffin, Nur Hamizah Abdul Ghani, Faiqa Shazeaa Mohd Salleh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Peach Palm (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohd Salahuddin Mohd BasriDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7946-9351
Nor Nadiah Abdul Karim ShahDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5435-3771
Alifdalino SulaimanDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3909-967X
Intan Syafinaz Mohamed Amin TawakkalDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Zuhair Mohd NorDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5537-4251
Siti Hajar AriffinDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nur Hamizah Abdul GhaniDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-7594
Faiqa Shazeaa Mohd SallehDepartment of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9499-7686
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the Food Wastage Footprint and Climate Change Report, about 15% of all fruits and 25% of all vegetables are wasted at the base of the food production chain. The significant losses and wastes in the fresh and processing industries is becoming a serious environmental issue, mainly due to the microbial degradation impacts. There has been a recent surge in research and innovation related to food, packaging, and pharmaceutical applications to address these problems. The underutilized wastes (seed, skin, rind, and pomace) potentially present good sources of valuable bioactive compounds, including functional nutrients, amylopectin, phytochemicals, vitamins, enzymes, dietary fibers, and oils. Fruit and vegetable wastes (FVW) are rich in nutrients and extra nutritional compounds that contribute to the development of animal feed, bioactive ingredients, and ethanol production. In the development of active packaging films, pectin and other biopolymers are commonly used. In addition, the most recent research studies dealing with FVW have enhanced the physical, mechanical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties of packaging and biocomposite systems. Innovative technologies that can be used for sensitive bioactive compound extraction and fortification will be crucial in valorizing FVW completely; thus, this article aims to report the progress made in terms of the valorization of FVW and to emphasize the applications of FVW in active packaging and biocomposites, their by-products, and the innovative technologies (both thermal and non-thermal) that can be used for bioactive compounds extraction.

Indexed as

active packagingbioactive compoundbiocompositesby-productextractionfruit wastenon-thermal processingthermal processingvegetable wastewaste valorization

Identifiers

PMID34685262
PMCPMC8539143
OpenAlexW3205890195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.