Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34684813›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs) in Sensors for Environmental and Biomedical Applications: A Review.

Abbas J Kadhem, Guillermina J Gentile, Maria M Fidalgo de Cortalezzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent progress in functional materials for electrochemical detection of pesticides: modification strategies, performance, and future challenges.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abbas J KadhemDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, E2509 Lafferre Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9337-986X
Guillermina J GentileDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires, Lavardén 315, Buenos Aires C1437FBG, Argentina.
Maria M Fidalgo de CortalezziDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, E2509 Lafferre Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6627-4504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular imprinted polymers are custom made materials with specific recognition sites for a target molecule. Their specificity and the variety of materials and physical shapes in which they can be fabricated make them ideal components for sensing platforms. Despite their excellent properties, MIP-based sensors have rarely left the academic laboratory environment. This work presents a comprehensive review of recent reports in the environmental and biomedical fields, with a focus on electrochemical and optical signaling mechanisms. The discussion aims to identify knowledge gaps that hinder the translation of MIP-based technology from research laboratories to commercialization.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMolecular ImprintingMolecularly Imprinted PolymersOptical DevicesOptical PhenomenaMolecularly Imprinted Polymersbiomedical devicesenvironmental sensingmolecular imprinted polymers

Identifiers

PMID34684813
PMCPMC8540986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.