Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34684777›Full record

SynthesisMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Effects of Zeolite as a Drug Delivery System on Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review.

Jessica Hao, Ivana Stavljenić Milašin, Zeynep Batu Eken, Marinka Mravak-Stipetic, Krešimir Pavelić, Fusun Ozer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pharmaceutically engineered olfactory-masking agents: Innovating oral drug delivery through multisensory excipient design.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. PMA-Zeolite: Chemistry and Diverse Medical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica HaoDepartment of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9741-3113
Ivana Stavljenić MilašinDental Polyclinic Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Zeynep Batu EkenDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Yeditepe University, 34728 Istanbul, Turkey.
Marinka Mravak-StipeticClinical Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-8603
Krešimir PavelićFaculty of Medicine, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, HR-52100 Pula, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-7706-6858
Fusun OzerDepartment of Preventative and Restorative Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zeolites and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) are widely studied as drug carrying nanoplatforms to enhance the specificity and efficacy of traditional anticancer drugs. At present, there is no other systematic review that assesses the potency of zeolites/ZIFs as anticancer drug carriers. Due to the porous nature and inherent pH-sensitive properties of zeolites/ZIFs, the compounds can entrap and selectively release anticancer drugs into the acidic tumor microenvironment. Therefore, it is valuable to provide a comprehensive overview of available evidence on the topic to identify the benefits of the compound as well as potential gaps in knowledge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential therapeutic applications of zeolites/ZIFs as drug delivery systems delivering doxorubicin (DOX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), curcumin, cisplatin, and miR-34a. Following PRISMA guidelines, an exhaustive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. No language or time limitations were used up to 25th August 2021. Only full text articles were selected that pertained to the usage of zeolites/ZIFs in delivering anticancer drugs. Initially, 1279 studies were identified, of which 572 duplicate records were excluded. After screening for the title, abstract, and full texts, 53 articles remained and were included in the qualitative synthesis. An Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR) test, which included a percent user agreement and reliability percent, was conducted for the 53 articles. The included studies suggest that anticancer drug-incorporated zeolites/ZIFs can be used as alternative treatment options to enhance the efficacy of cancer treatment by mitigating the drawbacks of drugs under conventional treatment.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsZeolitesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDoxorubicinDrug CarriersFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleNanoparticlesNeoplasmsPorosityTumor Cells, CulturedTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsDoxorubicinDrug CarriersZeolitesanticancer drugantineoplastic drugcancer therapyclinoptilolitedrug delivery systemmetal-organic frameworknanocarriersystematic reviewzeolitezeolitic imidazolate framework

Identifiers

PMID34684777
PMCPMC8540241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.