Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34684714›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

K-Carrageenan Stimulates Pre-Osteoblast Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation: A Potential Factor for the Promotion of Bone Regeneration?

Wei Cao, Jianfeng Jin, Gang Wu, Nathalie Bravenboer, Marco N Helder, Janak L Pathak, Behrouz Zandieh-Doulabi, Jolanda M A Hogervorst, Shingo Matsukawa, Lester C Geonzon and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bioinspired Collagen/κ-Carrageenan 3D Matrix forACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Carrageenan-Based Compounds as Wound Healing Materials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Wei CaoDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jianfeng JinDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2760-1311
Gang WuDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-2500
Nathalie BravenboerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco N HelderDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Janak L PathakGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2576-443X
Behrouz Zandieh-DoulabiDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-3241
Jolanda M A HogervorstDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Shingo MatsukawaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.
Lester C GeonzonSchool of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan.
Rommel G BacabacDepartment of Physics, Medical Biophysics Group, University of San Carlos, Cebu City 6000, Philippines.
Engelbert A J M SchultenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8245-6367
Jenneke Klein-NulendDepartment of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7661-199X
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLStomatology Hospital · CNTokyo University of Marine Science and Technology · JPUniversity of San Carlos · PHUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201608530156China Scholarship Council 201808440487Health~Holland LSHM19016, "BB"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20F20388Philippine Council for Industry, Energy, and Emerging Technology Research and Development 9446USC Research Office and Department of Physics not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current cell-based bone tissue regeneration strategies cannot cover large bone defects. K-carrageenan is a highly hydrophilic and biocompatible seaweed-derived sulfated polysaccharide, that has been proposed as a promising candidate for tissue engineering applications. Whether κ-carrageenan can be used to enhance bone regeneration is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether κ-carrageenan has osteogenic potential by testing its effect on pre-osteoblast proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Treatment with κ-carrageenan (0.5 and 2 mg/mL) increased both MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast adhesion and spreading at 1 h. K-carrageenan (0.125-2 mg/mL) dose-dependently increased pre-osteoblast proliferation and metabolic activity, with a maximum effect at 2 mg/mL at day three. K-carrageenan (0.5 and 2 mg/mL) increased osteogenic differentiation, as shown by enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity (1.8-fold increase at 2 mg/mL) at day four, and matrix mineralization (6.2-fold increase at 2 mg/mL) at day 21. K-carrageenan enhanced osteogenic gene expression (

Indexed as

AnimalsBone RegenerationCarrageenanCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationMiceOsteoblastsOsteogenesisTissue EngineeringCarrageenanbone defectbone regenerationcell-based bone tissue engineeringcell proliferationMC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblastosteogenic differentiationκ-carrageenan

Identifiers

PMID34684714
PMCPMC8541607
OpenAlexW3206303209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.