ArticleNutrients2021
Co-Design Practices in Diet and Nutrition Research: An Integrative Review.
Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Improving student diet and food security in higher education using participatory and co-creation approaches: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024Pooled it
- Digital behaviour change interventions to increase vegetable intake in adults: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of technology-based personalised feedback on diet quality in young Australian adults: results for the advice, ideas and motivation for my eating (Aim4Me) randomised controlled trial.Public health nutrition · 2023Trial
- Food Classification for Swallowing Disorders Perception by Senior Population.Journal of texture studies · 2026Article
- Community engagement in the creation of a novel dietary intervention for high school athletes: methods to include teen athletes and coaches in feasible ways.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Article
- Co-Developing User-Centred Nutrition Educational Resources to Integrate Nutrition Into Multiple Sclerosis Care: A Collaborative Approach With Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare Consumers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Facilitating food security systems change in regional Australia through a strengths-based, co-design process.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- From Documents to Digital: Co-Designing Nutrition Information Videos With Consumers and Dietitians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Evaluating co-design processes used in the development of healthcare interventions in residential aged care: a scoping review.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Co-Design of a Weekly Meal Box for Neurological Conditions: Findings From Consumer and Healthcare Provider Collaborative Workshops.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Technology-Assisted Motor-Cognitive Training Among Older Adults: Rapid Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR serious games · 2025Review
- i-REBOUND Cook Well After Stroke: Co-Designing a Culinary Nutrition Programme for Australian Stroke Survivors.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Co-Designing Recipe Resources to Support Healthy Eating in African-Caribbeans in the United Kingdom: An Academic and Community Partnership Approach.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Article
- A qualitative study on facilitators and barriers to adoption and implementation of nutrition interventions in higher education settings in Flanders.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Co-Design and Refinement of Curriculum-Based Foodbot Factory Intervention to Support Elementary School Nutrition Education.Nutrients · 2024Article
- From Streets to Tables: Bottom-Up Co-creation Case Studies for Healthier Food Environments in Vietnam and Nigeria.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Designing Child Nutrition Interventions to Engage Fathers: Qualitative Analysis of Interviews and Co-Design Workshops.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Co-design, the method of involving users, stakeholders, and practitioners in the process of design, may assist to improve the translation of health evidence into tangible and acceptable intervention prototypes. The primary objective of this review was to identify and describe co-design techniques used in nutrition research. The secondary objective was to identify associations between co-design techniques and intervention effectiveness. An integrative review was performed using the databases Emcare, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included those that: (1) utilised participatory research or co-design techniques, (2) described development and/or evaluation of interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours or nutrition, and (3) targeted community-dwelling adults aged ≥18 years. We identified 2587 studies in the initial search and included 22 eligible studies. There were 15 studies that utilised co-design techniques, with a strong focus on engagement of multiple stakeholder types and use of participatory research techniques. No study implemented a complete co-design process. Most studies (14/15) reporting outcomes reported positive health (maximum
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.