Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34684583›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

Evidence Update on the Relationship between Diet and the Most Common Cancers from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: A Systematic Review.

Esther Ubago-Guisado, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco, Ana Ching-López, Dafina Petrova, Esther Molina-Montes, Pilar Amiano, Aurelio Barricarte-Gurrea, María-Dolores Chirlaque, Antonio Agudo, María-José Sánchez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Empirically derived dietary patterns and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lifestyle and Reproductive Factors Associated with Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Esther Ubago-GuisadoCancer Registry of Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, 18011 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-2399
Miguel Rodríguez-BarrancoCancer Registry of Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, 18011 Granada, Spain.
Ana Ching-LópezCancer Registry of Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, 18011 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8266-430X
Dafina PetrovaCancer Registry of Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, 18011 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-6776
Esther Molina-MontesEpidemiology and Control of Chronic Diseases, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Pilar AmianoEpidemiology and Control of Chronic Diseases, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Aurelio Barricarte-GurreaEpidemiology and Control of Chronic Diseases, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6750-1270
María-Dolores ChirlaqueEpidemiology and Control of Chronic Diseases, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Antonio AgudoUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology-ICO, 08908 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
María-José SánchezCancer Registry of Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, 18011 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4817-0757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) is a multicentre prospective study conducted in 23 centres in 10 European countries. Here we review the findings from EPIC on the relationship between diet-related exposures and incidence or mortality from the four most frequent cancers in the European population: colorectal, breast, lung, and prostate cancer. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and identified 110 high-quality studies based on the EPIC cohort. Fruit and vegetable consumption had a protective effect against colorectal, breast, and lung cancer, whereas only fruit had a protective effect against prostate cancer. A higher consumption of fish and lower consumption of red and processed meat were related with a lower risk of colorectal cancer; and higher consumption of fatty fish with lower risk of breast cancer. Calcium and yogurt intake were found to protect against colorectal and prostate cancer. Alcohol consumption increased the risk for colorectal and breast cancer. Finally, adherence to the Mediterranean diet emerged as a protective factor for colorectal and breast cancer. The EPIC study results are in agreement with the latest evidence from leading authorities on cancer prevention and help to inform public prevention policies and strategies.

Indexed as

DietNutritional Physiological PhenomenaEuropeHumansNeoplasmsProspective Studiesalcoholbreast cancercolorectal cancerfishfruitsintakelung cancermeatprostate cancervegetables

Identifiers

PMID34684583
PMCPMC8540388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.