Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34684516›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Impacts of Fructose on Intestinal Barrier Function, Inflammation and Microbiota in a Piglet Model.

Pingting Guo, Haichao Wang, Linbao Ji, Peixia Song, Xi Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Macronutrients as Regulators of Intestinal Epithelial Permeability: Where Do We Stand?Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Fermented Purslane (Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pingting GuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7751-4083
Haichao WangDepartment of Animal Science, College of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4696-8394
Linbao JiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Peixia SongState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xi MaState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4562-9331
State Key Laboratory of Animal NutritionHebei University of Engineering · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFD0500501National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFD0500601National Natural Science Foundation of China 31722054National Natural Science Foundation of China 31829004National Natural Science Foundation of China 31930106the 111 Project B16044the National Ten-thousand Talents Program of China 23070201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metabolic disorder caused by excessive fructose intake was reported extensively and often accompanied by intestinal barrier dysfunction. And the rising dietary fructose was consumed at an early age of human. However, related researches were almost conducted in rodent models, while in the anatomy and physiology of gastrointestinal tract, pig is more similar to human beings than rodents. Hence, weaned piglets were chosen as the model animals in our study to investigate the fructose's impacts on intestinal tight junction, inflammation response and microbiota structure of piglets. Herein, growth performance, inflammatory response, oxidation resistance and ileal and colonic microbiota of piglet were detected after 35-day fructose supplementation. Our results showed decreased tight junction gene expressions in piglets after fructose addition, with no obvious changes in the growth performance, antioxidant resistance and inflammatory response. Moreover, fructose supplementation differently modified the microbiota structures in ileum and colon. In ileum, the proportions of Streptococcus and Faecalibacterium were higher in Fru group (fructose supplementation). In colon, the proportions of Blautia and Clostridium sensu stricto 1 were higher in Fru group. All the results suggested that tight junction dysfunction might be an earlier fructose-induced event than inflammatory response and oxidant stress and that altered microbes in ileum and colon might be the potential candidates to alleviate fructose-induced intestinal permeability alteration.

Indexed as

AnimalsColitisColonDietary SupplementsFructoseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIleumIntestinal MucosaModels, AnimalOxidative StressPermeabilitySwineTight JunctionsFructosefructoseintestinal barriermicrobesweaned piglets

Identifiers

PMID34684516
PMCPMC8541567
OpenAlexW3205174609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.