Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34684078›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021

Advances of Laparoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome.

Christos Arnaoutoglou, Rita S Variawa, Paul Zarogoulidis, Aris Ioannidis, Nikolaos Machairiotis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christos Arnaoutoglou1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8714-2524
Rita S VariawaIndependent Pharmacovigilance (Evaluation & Risk Management) Scientist, London E14 4HB, UK.
Paul Zarogoulidis3rd Surgery Department, AHEPA University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-2207
Aris IoannidisSurgery Department, "Genesis" Private Clinic, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikolaos MachairiotisFellow in Endometriosis and Minimal Access Surgery, Northwick Park, Central Middlesex and Ealing Hospitals, Acton Ln, London NW10 7NS, UK.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GREaling Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this review is to describe the effectiveness of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). PCS is a cause of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and is associated with dysfunction of the pelvic venous system. PCS is more common in women of reproductive age, and hormonal changes are associated with its development along with other reasons (e.g., working and living habits). There is an urgent need to establish an effective algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of CPP, which could have a dramatic effect in patients' everyday life. This algorithm should be able to overcome known issues that lead to the underdiagnosis of PCS, such as the overlap of its symptoms with other diseases. Here, we present our findings from literature articles about the methods used in practice today for the diagnosis of this syndrome. We also compare the methods to propose the most promising technique for providing a diagnosis with high accuracy. In our understanding, laparoscopy is superior when compared to other methods. It can provide a diagnosis of PCS while excluding or identifying other comorbidities and can also lead toward the next steps for the treatment of PCS.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLaparoscopyVaricose VeinsFemaleHumansPelvic PainPelvischronic pelvic painlaparoscopypelvic congestion syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34684078
PMCPMC8539457
OpenAlexW3203502081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.