Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34683891›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Highly Specific Blood-Brain Barrier Transmigrating Single-Domain Antibodies Selected by an In Vivo Phage Display Screening.

Sandra Isabel Aguiar, Joana N R Dias, Ana Santos André, Marta Lisete Silva, Diana Martins, Belmira Carrapiço, Miguel Castanho, João Carriço, Marco Cavaco, Maria Manuela Gaspar and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biocompatible hydrogel eradicates pregnancy-associated genital warts.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The contradictory role of febuxostat in ABCG2 expression and potentiating hypericin-mediated photodynamic therapy in colorectal cancers.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra Isabel AguiarCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.
Joana N R DiasCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1905-1871
Ana Santos AndréCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1916-6401
Marta Lisete SilvaCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.
Diana MartinsCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4536-2315
Belmira CarrapiçoCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.
Miguel CastanhoInstituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7891-7562
João CarriçoInstituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
Marco CavacoInstituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria Manuela GasparResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
Rui Jorge NobreViraVector, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research (III), Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Rua Larga, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal.
Luís Pereira de AlmeidaViraVector, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research (III), Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Rua Larga, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal.
Soraia OliveiraTechnophage SA, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
Lurdes GanoCentro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10 (Km 139.7), Bobadela, 2695-066 Boticas, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7186-2060
João D G CorreiaCentro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10 (Km 139.7), Bobadela, 2695-066 Boticas, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-4906
Carlos BarbasResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
João GonçalvesResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal.
Vera NevesInstituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2989-7208
Frederico Aires-da-SilvaCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3821-419X
University of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Coimbra · PTScripps Research Institute · USTechnoPhage (Portugal) · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-022095Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia DL57/2016/CP1438/CT0002Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia DL57/2016/CP1451/CT0023Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia IF/01010/2013Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/128281/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/BBB-BIO/0508/2014Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/BIA-BQM/5027/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/QUI-NUC/30147/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/100522/2014Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/00276/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04138/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04539/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/Multi/04349/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/NEU/04539/2019Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDP/04138/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major bottleneck in the successful development of central nervous system (CNS) drugs is the discovery and design of molecules that can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Nano-delivery strategies are a promising approach that take advantage of natural portals of entry into the brain such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting endogenous BBB receptors. However, the main selected mAbs rely on targeting broadly expressed receptors, such as the transferrin and insulin receptors, and in selection processes that do not fully mimic the native receptor conformation, leading to mistargeting and a low fraction of the administered dose effectively reaching the brain. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify new BBB receptors and explore novel antibody selection approaches that can allow a more selective delivery into the brain. Considering that in vitro models fail to completely mimic brain structure complexity, we explored an in vivo cell immunization approach to construct a rabbit derived single-domain antibody (sdAb) library towards BBB endothelial cell receptors. The sdAb antibody library was used in an in vivo phage display screening as a functional selection of novel BBB targeting antibodies. Following three rounds of selections, next generation sequencing analysis, in vitro brain endothelial barrier (BEB) model screenings and in vivo biodistribution studies, five potential sdAbs were identified, three of which reaching >0.6% ID/g in the brain. To validate the brain drug delivery proof-of-concept, the most promising sdAb, namely RG3, was conjugated at the surface of liposomes encapsulated with a model drug, the pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (PAN). The translocation efficiency and activity of the conjugate liposome was determined in a dual functional in vitro BEB-glioblastoma model. The RG3 conjugated PAN liposomes enabled an efficient BEB translocation and presented a potent antitumoral activity against LN229 glioblastoma cells without influencing BEB integrity. In conclusion, our in vivo screening approach allowed the selection of highly specific nano-antibody scaffolds with promising properties for brain targeting and drug delivery.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrierbrain targeting antibodiesdrug deliveryin vivo phage displaysingle-domain antibodies

Identifiers

PMID34683891
PMCPMC8540410
OpenAlexW3201693163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.