ArticlePharmaceutics2021
Bacterial Cellulose as a Potential Bio-Scaffold for Effective Re-Epithelialization Therapy.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Stem Cell Differentiation into Keratinocytes for Regenerative Applications.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Pooled it
- Bioinspired 3D Printing of Lignocellulose-Based Multimaterial Composites for Extracellular Matrix-Mimicking Architectures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing: Bridging Biomaterial Design and Clinical Unmet Needs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Design to Application: Advanced Cellulose Scaffolds for Engineered Tissue Regeneration.Polymers · 2026Review
- Engineering an electroactive bacterial cellulose-carbon nanotube composite membrane againstBiofilm · 2025Article
- Polymer-Based Scaffolds as an Implantable Material in Regenerative Dentistry: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Bacterial Cellulose Membrane Experimentally Implanted in the Peritoneum of Wistar Rats-Inflammatory Immunoreactivity and Oxidative Stress.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Article
- From Nature to Lab: Sustainable Bacterial Cellulose Production and Modification with Synthetic Biology.Polymers · 2023Review
- Development of Biocellulose Sheet IncorporatingACS omega · 2023Article
- Bacterial Cellulose-Based Blends and Composites: Versatile Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Surface Modification of Bacterial Cellulose for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, there are several therapeutic approaches available for wound injury management. However, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of how biomaterials affect cell behavior is needed to develop potential repair strategies. Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a bacteria-produced biopolymer with several advantageous qualities for skin tissue engineering. The aim here was to investigate BC-based scaffold on epithelial regeneration and wound healing by examining its effects on the expression of scavenger receptor-A (SR-A) and underlying macrophage behavior. Full-thickness skin wounds were generated on Sprague-Dawley rats and the healing of these wounds, with and without BC scaffolds, was examined over 14 days using Masson's trichome staining. BC scaffolds displayed excellent in vitro biocompatibility, maintained the stemness function of cells and promoted keratinocyte differentiation of cells, which are vital in maintaining and restoring the injured epidermis. BC scaffolds also exhibited positive in vivo effects on the wound microenvironment, including improved skin extracellular matrix deposition and controlled excessive inflammation by reduction of SR-A expression. Furthermore, BC scaffold significantly enhanced epithelialization by stimulating the balance of M1/M2 macrophage re-programming for beneficial tissue repair relative to that of collagen material. These findings suggest that BC-based materials are promising products for skin injury repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.