Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34683594›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

RETRACTED: Investigation of Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Welded Specimens of AA6061-T6 Alloy with Friction Stir Welding and Parallel-Friction Stir Welding Methods.

Amir Ghiasvand, Mohammad Mahdi Yavari, Jacek Tomków, John William Grimaldo Guerrero, Hasan Kheradmandan, Aleksei Dorofeev, Shabbir Memon, Hesamoddin Aghajani Derazkola

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Underwater Processing of Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amir GhiasvandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5587-001X
Mohammad Mahdi YavariDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah 67189-97551, Iran.
Jacek TomkówInstitute of Machines and Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza Street 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1096-7779
John William Grimaldo GuerreroDepartamento de Energía, Univesidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 55-66, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-5374
Hasan KheradmandanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak 38361-1-9131, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7628-2639
Aleksei DorofeevDepartment of Propaedeutics of Dental Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Shabbir MemonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-133, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8742-6439
Hesamoddin Aghajani DerazkolaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Nour Branch, Nour 21655432, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates the effect of two parameters of process type and tool offset on tensile, microhardness, and microstructure properties of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy joints. Three methods of Friction Stir Welding (FSW), Advancing Parallel-Friction Stir Welding (AP-FSW), and Retreating Parallel-Friction Stir Welding (RP-FSW) were used. In addition, four modes of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm of tool offset were used in two welding passes in AP-FSW and RP-FSW processes. Based on the results, it was found that the mechanical properties of welded specimens with AP-FSW and RP-FSW techniques experience significant increments compared to FSW specimens. The best mechanical and microstructural properties were observed in the samples welded by RP-FSW, AP-FSW, and FSW methods, respectively. Welded specimens with the RP-FSW technique had better mechanical properties than other specimens due to the concentration of material flow in the weld nugget and proper microstructure refinement. In both AP-FSW and RP-FSW processes, by increasing the tool offset to 1.5 mm, joint efficiency increased significantly. The highest weld strength was found for welded specimens by RP-FSW and AP-FSW processes with a 1.5 mm tool offset. The peak sample of the RP-FSW process (1.5 mm offset) had the closest mechanical properties to the base metal, in which the Yield Stress (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and elongation percentage (E%) were 76.4%, 86.5%, and 70% of base metal, respectively. In the welding area, RP-FSW specimens had smaller average grain size and higher hardness values than AP-FSW specimens.

Indexed as

aluminum alloymechanical propertiesparallel-friction stir weldingtool offset

Identifiers

PMID34683594
PMCPMC8538613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.