ArticleMicroorganisms2021
Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of TR34/L98H pan-azole-resistantFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026Article
- Poultry farms as reservoirs of azole-resistant fungi: Occupational health risks in agricultural facilities.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- The Effect of Temperature over the Growth and Biofilm Formation of the ThermotolerantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Boosting knowledge on occupational exposure to microbial contamination in Portuguese carpentries.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- One Health Approach to Tackle Microbial Contamination on Poultries-A Systematic Review.Toxics · 2023Review
- Microbial Contamination of Bedding Material: One Health in Poultry Production.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Microbial Contamination in the Coffee Industry: An Occupational Menace besides a Food Safety Concern?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Unveiling the Occupational Exposure to Microbial Contamination in Conservation-Restoration Settings.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Electrostatic Dust Cloth: A Useful Passive Sampling Method When Assessing Exposure to Fungi Demonstrated in Studies Developed in Portugal (2018-2021).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cytotoxicity ofToxins · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background
methodsA sampling approach protocol was performed using active (impaction method) and passive sampling methods (floor surfaces swabs, electrostatic dust collectors (EDCs), and settled dust). All samples were analysed by culture-based methods and passive sampling was used for molecular detection of
conclusionThis study confirms that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.