Comparison of Conventional Molecular and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods for Differentiating

I-Chen Li, Rayean Wu, Chung-Wen Hu, Keh-Ming Wu, Zeng-Weng Chen, Chung-Hsi Chou

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

5citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

The evolution of diagnostic microbiology: integrating culture-based methods and genomic advances.PeerJ · 2026
Review
Integrated Whole-Genome Sequencing and In Silico Characterization ofGenes · 2025
Article
High Salmonella load with serovar virchow dominance pose major public safety risk in postchill broiler carcasses.Poultry science · 2024
Article
Comparison of Reference-Based Assembly and De Novo Assembly for Bacterial Plasmid Reconstruction and AMR Gene Localization inMicroorganisms · 2022
Article
Antimicrobial Drug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I-Chen LiZoonoses Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106, Taiwan.

Rayean WuZoonoses Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106, Taiwan.

Chung-Wen HuZoonoses Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106, Taiwan.

Keh-Ming WuWelgene Biotech Co., Ltd., 12F, No. 3, Park St., Taipei City 115, Taiwan.

Zeng-Weng ChenAnimal Technology Research Center, Agricultural Technology Research Institute, No. 52, Kedong 2nd Rd., Zhunan Township, Miaoli County 350, Taiwan.

Chung-Hsi ChouZoonoses Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4983-2786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade,

Indexed as

CRISPRMLSTPFGESalmonellasubtypingWGS

Identifiers

PMID34683367

DOI10.3390/microorganisms9102046

PMCPMC8540620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.