Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34683183›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Improved Personalised Neuroendocrine Tumours' Diagnosis Predictive Power by New Receptor Somatostatin Image Processing Quantification.

Cati Raluca Stolniceanu, Mihaela Moscalu, Doina Azoicai, Bogdan Tamba, Constantin Volovat, Irena Grierosu, Teodor Ionescu, Wael Jalloul, Vlad Ghizdovat, Roxana Gherasim and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Cati Raluca StolniceanuDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Mihaela MoscaluDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8899-8594
Doina AzoicaiDepartment of Epidemiology, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Bogdan TambaAdvanced Center for Research and Development in Experimental Medicine (CEMEX), "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700454 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9868-1999
Constantin VolovatDepartment of Medicine III-Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Irena GrierosuDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Teodor IonescuDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Wael JalloulDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Vlad GhizdovatDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Roxana GherasimDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Simona VolovatDepartment of Medicine III-Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Feng WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Jingjing FuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Roxana MoscaluManchester Academic Health Science Centre, School of Medical Sciences Manchester, The University of Manchester, Manchester M139PT, UK.
Milovan MatovicClinical Center Kragujevac, Center for Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia.
Cipriana StefanescuDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics-Nuclear Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are intensively studied, their diagnosis and consequently personalised therapy management is still puzzling due to their tumoral heterogeneity. In their theragnosis algorithm, receptor somatostatin scintigraphy takes the central place, the diagnosis receptor somatostatin analogue (RSA) choice depending on laboratory experience and accessibility. However, in all cases, the results depend decisively on correct radiotracer tumoral uptake quantification, where unfortunately there are still unrevealed clues and lack of standardization. We propose an improved method to quantify the biodistribution of gamma-emitting RSA, using tissular corrected uptake indices. We conducted a bi-centric retrospective study on 101 patients with different types of NETs. Three uptake indices obtained after applying new corrections to areas of interest drawn for the tumour and for three reference organs (liver, spleen and lung) were statistically analysed. For the corrected pathological uptake indices, the results showed a significant decrease in the error of estimating the occurrence of errors and an increase in the diagnostic predictive power for NETs, especially in the case of lung-referring corrected index. In conclusion, these results support the importance of corrected uptake indices use in the analysis of

Indexed as

gamma emitters tracerNETsneuroendocrine tumoursquantificationuptake indices

Identifiers

PMID34683183
PMCPMC8539645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.