Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34683118›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Hyperparameter Tuning and Pipeline Optimization via Grid Search Method and Tree-Based AutoML in Breast Cancer Prediction.

Siti Fairuz Mat Radzi, Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim, M Iqbal Saripan, Mohd Amiruddin Abd Rahman, Iza Nurzawani Che Isa, Mohammad Johari Ibahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Natural Language Processing andJMIR medical informatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siti Fairuz Mat RadziDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.
Muhammad Khalis Abdul KarimDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5357-4193
M Iqbal SaripanDepartment of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.
Mohd Amiruddin Abd RahmanDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-9450
Iza Nurzawani Che IsaProgramme of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Mohammad Johari IbahimFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh 47200, Malaysia.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia FRGS/1/2020/STG07/UPM/02/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated machine learning (AutoML) has been recognized as a powerful tool to build a system that automates the design and optimizes the model selection machine learning (ML) pipelines. In this study, we present a tree-based pipeline optimization tool (TPOT) as a method for determining ML models with significant performance and less complex breast cancer diagnostic pipelines. Some features of pre-processors and ML models are defined as expression trees and optimal gene programming (GP) pipelines, a stochastic search system. Features of radiomics have been presented as a guide for the ML pipeline selection from the breast cancer data set based on TPOT. Breast cancer data were used in a comparative analysis of the TPOT-generated ML pipelines with the selected ML classifiers, optimized by a grid search approach. The principal component analysis (PCA) random forest (RF) classification was proven to be the most reliable pipeline with the lowest complexity. The TPOT model selection technique exceeded the performance of grid search (GS) optimization. The RF classifier showed an outstanding outcome amongst the models in combination with only two pre-processors, with a precision of 0.83. The grid search optimized for support vector machine (SVM) classifiers generated a difference of 12% in comparison, while the other two classifiers, naïve Bayes (NB) and artificial neural network-multilayer perceptron (ANN-MLP), generated a difference of almost 39%. The method's performance was based on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis.

Indexed as

breast cancergenetic programmingmachine learningtree-based pipeline optimization tool

Identifiers

PMID34683118
PMCPMC8540332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.