Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34683040›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Access to Healthcare for Minors: An Ethical Analysis of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.

Fabian-Alexander Tietze, Marcin Orzechowski, Marianne Nowak, Florian Steger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabian-Alexander TietzeInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Parkstraße 11, D-89073 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2007-3015
Marcin OrzechowskiInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Parkstraße 11, D-89073 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4244-7989
Marianne NowakInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Parkstraße 11, D-89073 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5452-2814
Florian StegerInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Parkstraße 11, D-89073 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8108-1591

Funding

Humanities in the European Research Area (HERA) HERA 2.029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The right to non-discriminatory access to healthcare is anchored in the European Convention on Human Rights and other international treaties or guidelines. Since its ratification, the European Convention on Human Rights was made binding in all Member States of the Council of Europe and is interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Despite its legal recognition, discrimination in healthcare provision has repeatedly been an issue of medicoethical and political consideration. In this context, minors are particularly in danger of being deprived of this fundamental right. The aim of this study is to analyze the current state of the ECtHR jurisdiction on challenges in accessing healthcare for minor patients. We conducted a systematic search of judgments by the ECtHR using the keywords "healthcare" and "child". We performed descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. Our search resulted in

Indexed as

access to healthcare servicesbarriersinternational lawmedical ethicsminorsvulnerable population

Identifiers

PMID34683040
PMCPMC8544556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.