Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34683010›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Individual Determinants of Rest-Break Behavior in Occupational Settings.

Gerhard Blasche, Johannes Wendsche, Theresa Tschulik, Rudolf Schoberberger, Lisbeth Weitensfelder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerhard BlascheCenter for Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4779-4843
Johannes WendscheFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, D-01099 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-4016
Theresa TschulikCenter for Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf SchoberbergerCenter for Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Lisbeth WeitensfelderCenter for Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWork breaks improve well-being, productivity, and health. The aim of this study was to investigate the individual determinants of rest-break behavior during work using the theory of planned behavior (TPB).

methodsThe association between attitude, control, and subjective norm and rest-break intention (i.e., taking rest breaks regularly), and rest-break behavior (average number of rest breaks/workhour) was analyzed with stepwise linear regression in a cross-sectional design. The study participants included 109 clerical employees, and 215 nurses.

resultsAttitude and control were positively associated with rest-break intention. Intention and control were positively associated with rest-break behavior. The effect of intention was moderated by occupation, with intention being more weakly associated with rest-break behavior in nurses who had less behavioral control.

conclusionsJob control is the major predictor of rest-break behavior, with attitudes playing a minor role, and social norm playing no role. To increase rest-break behavior, a greater extent of job control is necessary.

Indexed as

attitudebehavioral intentionjob controlrest-break behaviorrest breakssubjective normtheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID34683010
PMCPMC8544579
OpenAlexW3203491422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.