Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682977›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Psychological Aspects of Media Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Healthcare and Pharmacy Specialists in Lithuania.

Nida Žemaitienė, Milda Kukulskienė, Vilma Miglinė, Loreta Kubilienė, Gabrielė Urbonaitė, Laura Digrytė-Šertvytienė, Aušra Norė, Kastytis Šmigelskas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nida ŽemaitienėFaculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Milda KukulskienėFaculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vilma MiglinėCommunity Well-Being Center, Mykolas Romeris University, 08303 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Loreta KubilienėDepartment of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gabrielė UrbonaitėFaculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Laura Digrytė-ŠertvytienėFaculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Aušra NorėFaculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Kastytis ŠmigelskasFaculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-5371-9500
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTMykolas Romeris University · LT

Funding

Lithuanian science council S-COV-20-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the setting of disasters, people seek information as they hope that knowledge will provide security. This makes the media a critical source of crisis exposure. The aim of the study described in this article was to analyze COVID-19 pandemic-related psychological aspects of media use by healthcare and pharmacy workers in Lithuania and to reveal the subjective effects of media consumption on their psychological well-being. 967 healthcare workers and pharmacists in Lithuania completed an electronic survey, which consisted of questions about the changes in well-being experienced since the beginning of the lockdown and media use in the search for information on COVID-19. It was found that communication might have ambiguous effects on psychological well-being. Excessive, unreliable, misleading, contradictory information and "catastrophizing" were subjectively related to impaired psychological well-being. Objective and reliable, relevant, clear, timely, hopeful and supportive information had a subjective positive effect. Seeking COVID-19-related information many times a day was associated with increased fear of becoming infected with COVID-19, feeling unable to control the risk of contracting COVID-19, fear of infecting relatives with COVID-19 and feeling that other people would avoid interaction with healthcare workers and pharmacists because of their job. General browsing was not consistently associated with COVID-19-related fears.

Indexed as

COVID-19healthcare workersmedia communicationmental healthpandemicspharmacy specialistspsychological well-beingrisk communication

Identifiers

PMID34682977
PMCPMC8544581
OpenAlexW3203828851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.