Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682972›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Doctors' Views on How to Improve Communication and Quality of Care for Patients Experiencing End-of-Life: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Fiona McCormack, Rachel Hopley, Judith Kurth, Zafar Iqbal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fiona McCormackCentre for Health and Development (CHAD), School of Health, Science and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3040-8969
Rachel HopleyInstitute for Community Research and Development (ICRD), Faculty of Arts, Business and Social Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1AD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9622-9659
Judith KurthPublic Health England, Manchester M1 3BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6877-4174
Zafar IqbalMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Trust HQ, St Georges Hospital, Stafford ST16 3SR, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: There remains a lack of sufficient progress in enhancing quality of care for patients experiencing end-of-life. This study aimed to better understand the views of doctors on how to improve end-of-life healthcare, in light of existing challenges and processes. (2) Methods: This qualitative descriptive study used semi-structured individual interviews. Through purposive sampling, sixteen doctors from primary care (three general practices) or acute care (one National Health Service hospital trust) participated. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematic analysis conducted. (3) Results: Two main themes were identified: First, planning for patient-centred care-conversations about end-of-life care should take place earlier to allow for care that is planned and personalised. The need for more training and improvements to documenting patient wishes were highlighted. Second, delivering on patients' wishes: improvements to the healthcare system-the importance of a record of patient wishes that can be shared across the system was identified. Improved utilisation of available resources is also needed to better deliver quality patient-centred care. (4) Conclusion: More effective communication and coordination across acute and primary care settings is needed. The importance of patient wishes and advance care planning was emphasised. More guidance at a strategic level may help provide clarity about expectations, roles and responsibilities.

Indexed as

advance care planningcommunicationdelivery of healthcareend-of-life carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID34682972
PMCPMC8535621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.