Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682950›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Evaluation of the Efficiency of European Health Systems Using Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis.

Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego, María Gómez-Gallego, Javier Fernando García-García, Ursula Faura-Martinez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review on the 40 Years of Existence of Data Envelopment Analysis Models: Historic Development and Current Trends.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan Cándido Gómez-GallegoApplied Economics Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
María Gómez-GallegoClinical Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, San Antonio Catholic University, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Javier Fernando García-GarcíaClinical Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, San Antonio Catholic University, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Ursula Faura-MartinezQuantitative Methods Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6373-9433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies that assess efficiency in health systems are based on output mean values. That approach ignores the representativeness of the average statistic, which can become a serious problem in estimation. To solve this question, this research contributes in three different ways: the first aim is to evaluate the technical efficiency in the management of European health systems considering a set of DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) and FDEA (Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis) models. A second goal is to assess the bias in the estimation of efficiency when applying the conventional DEA. The third objective is the evaluation of the statistical relationship between the bias in the efficiency estimation and the macroeconomic variables (income inequality and economic freedom). The main results show positive correlations between DEA and FDEA scores. Notwithstanding traditional DEA models overestimate efficiency scores. Furthermore, the size of the bias is positively related to income inequality and negative with economic freedom in the countries evaluated.

Indexed as

data envelopment analysisefficiencyfreedom economicsfuzzy datahealth systemincome inequality

Identifiers

PMID34682950
PMCPMC8536069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.