Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682942›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Assessing Cranial Nerves in Physical Therapy Practice: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey and Implication for Clinical Practice.

Firas Mourad, Giovanni Lopez, Fabio Cataldi, Filippo Maselli, Leonardo Pellicciari, Mattia Salomon, Hendrikus Kranenburg, Roger Kerry, Alan Taylor, Nathan Hutting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Understanding degenerative cervical myelopathy in musculoskeletal practice.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Firas MouradDepartment of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, 4671 Differdange, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-8981-2085
Giovanni LopezDepartment of Clinical Science and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Fabio CataldiDepartment of Clinical Science and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2026-392X
Filippo MaselliSovrintendenza Sanitaria Regionale Puglia INAIL, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9683-9975
Leonardo PellicciariIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 50143 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-3759
Mattia SalomonDepartment of Clinical Science and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5315-4236
Hendrikus KranenburgResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9714 CE Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roger KerryDivision of Physiotherapy and Sport Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham University, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Alan TaylorDivision of Physiotherapy and Sport Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham University, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
Nathan HuttingDepartment of Occupation and Health, School of Organisation and Development, HAN University of Applied Sciences, 6503 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSerious pathologies of the neck can potentially result in cranial nerve palsy. Knowledge about cranial nerve examination (CNE) seems sparse, and its use is still unknown. We aim to investigate the knowledge, skills, and utilization of CNE of Italian physiotherapists. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn online cross-sectional survey.

results396 completed the survey, reaching the required sample size. Although Italian physiotherapists consider CNE relevant (mean ± SD = 7.6/10 ± 2.0), over half of all responders (

conclusionsa substantial proportion of Italian physiotherapists are not schooled in the fundamentals of cranial nerve examination. Given the number of physiotherapists who work in first contact roles, this is a professional concern.

Indexed as

cranial nerve examinationdifferential diagnosisneck painneurological examinationphysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID34682942
PMCPMC8535196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.