Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682937›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Balancing Equity and Efficiency in the Allocation of Health Resources-Where Is the Middle Ground?

James Avoka Asamani, Samuel Anongiba Alugsi, Hamza Ismaila, Juliet Nabyonga-Orem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What Matters Most: The Top 10 Child and Adolescent Cancer Research Priorities in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James Avoka AsamaniUniversal Health Coverage-Life Course Cluster Inter-Country Support Team for Eastern and Southern Africa, Regional Office for Africa, World Health Organisation, 82-86 Cnr Enterprise/Glenara Roads, Harare CY 348, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-0620-6010
Samuel Anongiba AlugsiFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH8 8AJ, UK.
Hamza IsmailaGhana Health Service-Headquarters, Private Mail Bag, Ministries, Accra 23302, Ghana.
Juliet Nabyonga-OremUniversal Health Coverage-Life Course Cluster Inter-Country Support Team for Eastern and Southern Africa, Regional Office for Africa, World Health Organisation, 82-86 Cnr Enterprise/Glenara Roads, Harare CY 348, Zimbabwe.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The notion of equity in health service delivery has been embodied in several of the Global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially the aspiration for universal health coverage (UHC). At the same time, escalating healthcare costs amidst dwindling resources continue to ignite discussions on the efficiency aspect of healthcare delivery at both operational and system levels. Therefore, health planners and managers have had to grapple with balancing the two, given limited resources and sophisticated population health needs. Undoubtedly, the concepts of equity and efficiency have overarching importance in healthcare. While efficiency dictates an 'economical' use of the limited healthcare resources, equity advocates their fair and ethical use. Some have leaned on this to argue that one has to be forgone in search of the other. In search of a 'middle ground', this paper explores the conceptual underpinnings of equity and efficiency in the context of healthcare resource allocation with some empirical examples from high-income and low- and middle-income settings. We conclude by arguing that equity and efficiency are, and ought to be, treated as complementary rather than conflicting considerations in distributing health resources. Each could be pursued without necessarily compromising the other-what matters is an explicit criterion of what will be 'equitable' in ensuring efficient allocation of resources, and on the other hand, what options will be considered more 'efficient' when equity objectives are pursued. Thus, equity can be achieved in an efficient way, while efficiency can drive the attainment of equity.

Indexed as

efficiencyequityhealthcareresource allocation

Identifiers

PMID34682937
PMCPMC8536061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.