Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682906›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Rola Khamisy-Farah, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Giorgio Bogani, Fabio Martinelli, Salvatore Lopez, Valentina Chiappa, Mauro Signorelli, Antonino Ditto, Francesco Raspagliesi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Residual disease volume and prognosis in endometrioid precancer after progestin therapy.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Umberto Leone Roberti MaggioreGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3744-2668
Rola Khamisy-FarahClalit Health Service, Akko, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 13100, Israel.
Nicola Luigi BragazziLaboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8409-868X
Giorgio BoganiGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-8569
Fabio MartinelliGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4863-1747
Salvatore LopezGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Valentina ChiappaGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Mauro SignorelliGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Antonino DittoGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Francesco RaspagliesiGynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITBar-Ilan University · ILYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is currently the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in developed countries. Although it is more common in postmenopausal women, it may affect up to 25% in the premenopausal age and 3-5% under the age of 40 years. Furthermore, in the last decades a significant shift to pregnancy at older maternal ages, particularly in resource-rich countries, has been observed. Therefore, in this scenario fertility-sparing alternatives should be discussed with patients affected by EC. This study summarizes available literature on fertility-sparing management of patients affected by EC, focusing on the oncologic and reproductive outcomes. A systematic computerized search of the literature was performed in two electronic databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) in order to identify relevant articles to be included for the purpose of this systematic review. On the basis of available evidence, fertility-sparing alternatives are oral progestins alone or in combination with other drugs, levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hysteroscopic resection in association with progestin therapies. These strategies seem feasible and safe for young patients with G1 endometrioid EC limited to the endometrium. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of fertility-sparing treatments and future well-designed studies are required.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerfertility-sparinghysteroscopymetforminprogestin

Identifiers

PMID34682906
PMCPMC8539778
OpenAlexW3205035595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.