Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682881›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Different Inspiratory Flow Waveform during Volume-Controlled Ventilation in ARDS Patients.

Davide Chiumello, Andrea Meli, Tommaso Pozzi, Manuela Lucenteforte, Paolo Simili, Elda Sterchele, Silvia Coppola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Davide ChiumelloDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital, Via Di Rudini 9, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Andrea MeliDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Hospital Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5470-2978
Tommaso PozziDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Manuela LucenteforteDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Paolo SimiliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Elda StercheleDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Silvia CoppolaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital, Via Di Rudini 9, 20142 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9290-5090
University of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most used types of mechanical ventilation are volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation, respectively characterized by a square and a decelerating flow waveform. Nowadays, the clinical utility of different inspiratory flow waveforms remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of four different inspiratory flow waveforms in ARDS patients. Twenty-eight ARDS patients (PaO

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeflow waveformsmechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID34682881
PMCPMC8540057
OpenAlexW3207722058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.