Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682874›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

When Conventional Oxygen Therapy Fails-The Effectiveness of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Respiratory Failure in the Course of COVID-19.

Marta Rorat, Wojciech Szymański, Tomasz Jurek, Maciej Karczewski, Jakub Zelig, Krzysztof Simon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05197686 (Early-initiated High Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy Among Patients With ARDS in the Course of SARS-CoV2 Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05197686 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Early-initiated High Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy Among Patients With ARDS in the Course of SARS-CoV2 Pneumonia: Prognosis and Impact on the Respiratory and Cardiovascular Systems.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPomeranian Medical University SzczecinRan2022 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsCorona Virus Infection, ARDS Due to Disease Caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, Oxygen DeficiencyArmsOxygen theraphy with high flow nasal cannule, Oxygen theraphy with mask with reservoir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula therapy on clinical outcomes in adults with COVID-19: A systematic review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Noninvasive Respiratory Assist Devices in the Management of COVID-19-related Hypoxic Respiratory Failure: Pune ISCCM COVID-19 ARDS Study Consortium (PICASo).Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta RoratDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-4945
Wojciech SzymańskiDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-6718
Tomasz JurekDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0110-0276
Maciej KarczewskiDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8811-8916
Jakub ZeligSecond Infectious Diseases Ward, Gromkowski Regional Specialist Hospital in Wroclaw, 51-149 Wroclaw, Poland.
Krzysztof SimonDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education SUB.A120.21.030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is recommended as a first-line treatment in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. We assessed the effectiveness of HFNO and predictors of failure and death. The medical records of 200 consecutive adult patients treated with HFNO were analysed. Ninety-two patients (46%) were successfully cured, 52 (26%) required noninvasive ventilation, and 61 (30.5%) received intubation. Overall mortality was 40.5%. Risk factors of HFNO ineffectiveness were: SpO

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeoxygen therapySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34682874
PMCPMC8541059
OpenAlexW3205620304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.