Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682779›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Differences in Patients' and Surgeons' Expectations before Shoulder Stabilization Surgery.

Katrin Karpinski, Fabian Plachel, Christian Gerhardt, Tim Saier, Mark Tauber, Alexander Auffarth, Doruk Akgün, Philipp Moroder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katrin KarpinskiCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Klinik für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Fabian PlachelCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Klinik für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Christian GerhardtSt. Vincentius-Klinik Karlsruhe, 76137 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Tim SaierBG Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418 Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany.
Mark TauberATOS Klinik München, 81925 München, Germany.
Alexander AuffarthUniversitätsklinikum Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Doruk AkgünCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Klinik für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Philipp MoroderCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Klinik für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary goal of shoulder stabilization procedures is to re-establish stability and many surgeons measure the success after shoulder stabilization surgery only by the absence of re-dislocation. However, patients might also suffer from pain, loss of range of motion and strength as well as anxiety and stigmatization and therefore have other expectations from a stabilization surgery than just a stable shoulder. Purpose of this study was to analyze if surgeons know what their patients typically expect from a shoulder stabilization surgery. Furthermore, the aim was to analyze the influence of various factors on patients' expectations. MATERIALS AND

methods204 patients with a diagnosis of shoulder instability scheduled for surgical treatment were included in this prospective multicentric study. Preoperatively, objective and subjective scores were obtained and patients were asked about their postoperative expectations. Additionally, 25 surgeons were interviewed with regard to what they think their patients expect from the surgery using standardized questions.

resultsWith regard to postoperative expectations surveyed by the Hospital for Special Surgery questionnaire (HSS), the most important goal to achieve for the patients was 'stopping the shoulder from dislocation', followed by 'to improve the ability to exercise or participate in sports' and 'being the shoulder to be back the way it was before the issue started'. The ranking of factors for patients was 'stability' as the most important to achieve, followed by 'movement', 'strength', 'pain' and 'cosmetics'. For surgeons, the order was 'stability' (

conclusionPatients and surgeons expectations regarding outcome after surgical shoulder stabilization procedures are quite similar with limited topics of disagreement. Generally, surgeons tend to overrate the importance of stability at the costs of other factors.

Indexed as

patients’ expectationsshoulder instabilityshoulder stabilizationsurgeons’ expectations

Identifiers

PMID34682779
PMCPMC8538762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.