Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682636›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Efficacy of Communication Techniques and Health Outcomes of Bushfire Smoke Exposure: A Scoping Review.

Emily Heaney, Laura Hunter, Angus Clulow, Devin Bowles, Sotiris Vardoulakis

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Burning issues: trends in newspaper coverage of wildfire events and health.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Effect of Wildfires on Asthma and Allergies.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bushfire Smoke and Children's Health-Exploring a Communication Gap.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily HeaneyANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Laura HunterANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Angus ClulowANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Devin BowlesNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Sotiris VardoulakisNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3944-7128
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health officials communicate the relevant risks of bushfire smoke exposure and associated health protection measures to affected populations. Increasing global bushfire incidence in the context of climate change motivated this scoping review. English-language publications related to adverse health outcomes following bushfire smoke exposure and publications relating to communication during natural disasters were included. Bushfire smoke events potentially increase healthcare contact, especially presentations triggered by respiratory illness. At-risk populations include those with underlying cardiorespiratory disease, elderly, paediatric, pregnant persons, and First Nations people. We found that social media, television, and radio are among the most common information sources utilised in bushfire smoke events. Message style, content, and method of delivery can directly influence message uptake and behaviour modification. Age, rurality, and geographical location influence information source preferences. Culturally and linguistically diverse groups and those with hearing, vision, and mobility-related disabilities may benefit from targeted health recommendations. This review emphasises the health effects of bushfire smoke exposure and related communication recommendations during and after bushfire smoke events. Additional investigation may further clarify the health effects of bushfire smoke exposure and efficacy of related health messaging, particularly in at-risk populations. Quantitative comparison of communication methods may yield more specific recommendations for future bushfire smoke events.

Indexed as

FiresSmokeAgedChildClimate ChangeCommunicationEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyPublic HealthSmokeair pollutionbushfirecommunicationenvironmental health literacymediapublic healthsmokewildfire

Identifiers

PMID34682636
PMCPMC8536189
OpenAlexW3206507482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.