Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682626›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Effectiveness of Narrative Messaging Styles about the Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequities in Ontario, Canada.

Emily Churchill, Ketan Shankardass, Andrea M L Perrella, Aisha Lofters, Carlos Quiñonez, Louise Brooks, Dana Wilson, Maritt Kirst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Health Impacts of Migration and Policy on the Iranian Diaspora.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. On Target: Environmental Health Messaging That Hits the Mark.Environmental health perspectives · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily ChurchillDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada.
Ketan ShankardassDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada.
Andrea M L PerrellaDepartment of Political Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada.
Aisha LoftersWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7322-0894
Carlos QuiñonezFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Louise BrooksWellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health, Guelph, ON N1G 0E1, Canada.
Dana WilsonPublic Health Sudbury & Districts, Sudbury, ON P3E 3A3, Canada.
Maritt KirstDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health inequities are systemic, avoidable, and unjust differences in health between populations. These differences are often determined by social and structural factors, such as income and social status, employment and working conditions, or race/racism, which are referred to as the social determinants of health (SDOH). According to public opinion, health is considered to be largely determined by the choices and behaviours of individuals. However, evidence suggests that social and structural factors are the key determinants of health. There is likely a lack of public understanding of the role that social and structural factors play in determining health and producing health inequities. Public opinion and priorities can drive governmental action, so the aim of this work was to determine the most impactful way to increase knowledge and awareness about the social determinants of health (SDOH) and health inequities in the province of Ontario, Canada. A study to test the effectiveness of four different messaging styles about health inequities and the SDOH was conducted with a sample of 805 adult residents of Ontario. Findings show that messages highlighting the challenges faced by those experiencing the negative effects of the SDOH, while still acknowledging individual responsibility for health, were the most effective for eliciting an empathetic response from Ontarians. These findings can be used to inform public awareness campaigns focused on changing the current public narrative about the SDOH toward a more empathetic response, with the goal of increasing political will to enact policies to address health inequities in Ontario.

Indexed as

RacismSocial Determinants of HealthAdultHealth Status DisparitiesHumansIncomeOntarioPublic Opinionhealth inequitiesmessagingpublic opinionsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID34682626
PMCPMC8535318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.