Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682584›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the General Population of the Veneto Region: Results of a Screening Campaign with Third-Generation Rapid Antigen Tests in the Pre-Vaccine Era.

Silvia Cocchio, Michele Nicoletti, Francesco Paolo De Siena, Gaia Lattavo, Patrizia Furlan, Marco Fonzo, Michele Tonon, Federico Zabeo, Francesca Russo, Vincenzo Baldo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia CocchioDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Michele NicolettiDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-9134
Francesco Paolo De SienaDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Gaia LattavoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Patrizia FurlanDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Marco FonzoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Michele TononRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary Public Health-Regione del Veneto, 30123 Venice, Italy.
Federico ZabeoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Francesca RussoRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary Public Health-Regione del Veneto, 30123 Venice, Italy.
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-9453
University of Padua · ITRegione del Veneto · IT

Funding

Veneto Regional Authority DGR 1643 del 24/11/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to ascertain the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population during a period of moderate risk, just before Italy started to implement its vaccination campaign. A third-generation antigenic nasal swab sample was collected by a healthcare provider, and all individuals testing positive subsequently had a nasopharyngeal swab for molecular testing; the result was used to calculate the positive predictive value. The population consisted of 4467 asymptomatic adults with a mean age of 46.8 ± 16.00 years. The 62.2% tested for the first time, while 37.8% had previously undergone a mean 2.2 tests for SARS-CoV-2. With 77 of our overall sample reporting they had previously tested positive for COVID-19 and 14 found positive on our screening test, the overall estimated prevalence of the infection was 0.31%. Nine of the 14 cases were confirmed on molecular testing with a PPV of 64.3%. The mean age of the individuals testing positive was 38.1 ± 17.4. Based on the timing of symptom onset, six of the above cases were classified as false negatives, and the adjusted estimated prevalence was 0.34%. Describing levels of infection in a general population seems to be very difficult to achieve, and the universal screening proved hugely expensive particularly in a low-prevalence situation. Anyway, it is only thanks to mass screening efforts that epidemiological data have been collected. This would support the idea that routine screening may have an impact on mitigating the spread of the virus in higher-risk environments, where people come into contact more frequently, as in the workplace.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2VaccinesCOVID-19epidemiologypublic healthSARS-CoV-2surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34682584
PMCPMC8536082
OpenAlexW3205912462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.