ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Enhancing Interprofessional Collaboration in Perioperative Setting from the Qualitative Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Interprofessional communication - a concept analysis inspired by Schwartz-Barcott and Kim´s hybrid model.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Drivers of unprofessional behaviour between staff in acute care hospitals: a realist review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Latent profiles of career growth among early-career operating room nurses: a cross-sectional study informed by Conservation of Resources theory.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Experiences of nurses in exploring and managing preoperative anxiety and information needs of patients at district hospitals in Ashanti region, Ghana.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Impact of Multidisciplinary Doctor-Nurse-Therapist Rounds on Perioperative Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Diminishment by Design: The Role of Class, Gender and Architecture in Shaping the Nursing Profession.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2025Article
- Developing a maturity-level model for interprofessional collaboration in elective surgery preparation.Narra J · 2025Article
- Perioperative Communication Gaps: A Qualitative Exploration.AORN journal · 2025Article
- Determinants of interprofessional collaboration in surgery: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Optimizing Teamwork in the Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Actionable Teamwork Strategies.Cureus · 2024Article
- Interventions to address unprofessional behaviours between staff in acute care: what works for whom and why? A realist review.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Understanding interaction between patients and nurse anesthetists. A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communication failures were a leading cause of sentinel events in the operation room due to frequently the communication breakdown occurs between physicians and nurses. This study explored the perspectives of surgical teams (nurses, physicians, and anaesthesiologists) on interprofessional collaboration and improvement strategies. A surgical team comprising eight perioperative nurses, four surgeons, and four anaesthesiologists from a university-affiliated hospital participated in this qualitative and phenomenological research from December 2018 to April 2019. Data were collected in in-depth interviews and were used in a thematic analysis according to Colaizzi to extract themes and categorised codes with the ATLAS.ti software. The result is presented in three generic categories: Barrier-like disruptive behaviours and lack of coordination of care; consequences by safety threats to the patient; overcoming barriers by shared decision making among professionals, flattened hierarchies, and teamwork/communication training. The conclusion is that different teams' perspectives can facilitate genuine reflection, discussion, and implementation of targeted interventions to improve operating room interprofessional collaboration and overcome barriers and their consequences. Currently, there is a need to change towards interprofessional collaboration for optimal patient outcomes and to ensure all professionals' expectations are met.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.