Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682081›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Resolved Mutual Information Function as a Structural Fingerprint of Biomolecular Sequences for Interpretable Machine Learning Classifiers.

Katrin Sophie Bohnsack, Marika Kaden, Julia Abel, Sascha Saralajew, Thomas Villmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katrin Sophie BohnsackSaxon Institute for Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, 09648 Mittweida, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2361-107X
Marika KadenSaxon Institute for Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, 09648 Mittweida, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-3463
Julia AbelSaxon Institute for Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, 09648 Mittweida, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2659-0403
Sascha SaralajewBosch Center for Artificial Intelligence, 71272 Renningen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-8062
Thomas VillmannSaxon Institute for Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, 09648 Mittweida, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6725-0141

Funding

European Social Fund 8231421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present article we propose the application of variants of the mutual information function as characteristic fingerprints of biomolecular sequences for classification analysis. In particular, we consider the resolved mutual information functions based on Shannon-, Rényi-, and Tsallis-entropy. In combination with interpretable machine learning classifier models based on generalized learning vector quantization, a powerful methodology for sequence classification is achieved which allows substantial knowledge extraction in addition to the high classification ability due to the model-inherent robustness. Any potential (slightly) inferior performance of the used classifier is compensated by the additional knowledge provided by interpretable models. This knowledge may assist the user in the analysis and understanding of the used data and considered task. After theoretical justification of the concepts, we demonstrate the approach for various example data sets covering different areas in biomolecular sequence analysis.

Indexed as

classificationinterpretable modelsmachine learningmutual informationsequence analysis

Identifiers

PMID34682081
PMCPMC8534762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.