Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34682060›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Local Integral Regression Network for Cell Nuclei Detection.

Xiao Zhou, Miao Gu, Zhen Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao ZhouDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5121-5640
Miao GuDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Zhen ChengDepartment of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8197-5560

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62103228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclei detection is a fundamental task in the field of histopathology image analysis and remains challenging due to cellular heterogeneity. Recent studies explore convolutional neural networks to either isolate them with sophisticated boundaries (segmentation-based methods) or locate the centroids of the nuclei (counting-based approaches). Although these two methods have demonstrated superior success, their fully supervised training demands considerable and laborious pixel-wise annotations manually labeled by pathology experts. To alleviate such tedious effort and reduce the annotation cost, we propose a novel local integral regression network (LIRNet) that allows both fully and weakly supervised learning (FSL/WSL) frameworks for nuclei detection. Furthermore, the LIRNet can output an exquisite density map of nuclei, in which the localization of each nucleus is barely affected by the post-processing algorithms. The quantitative experimental results demonstrate that the FSL version of the LIRNet achieves a state-of-the-art performance compared to other counterparts. In addition, the WSL version has exhibited a competitive detection performance and an effortless data annotation that requires only 17.5% of the annotation effort.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksfully supervised learninglocal integral regressionnuclei detectionweakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34682060
PMCPMC8535160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.